Detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions: Mangafodipir vs. superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

被引:25
|
作者
Kim, MJ
Kim, JH
Lim, JS
Oh, YT
Chung, JJ
Choi, JS
Lee, WJ
Kim, KW
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Severance Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol Sci, Severance Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Brain Korea Project Med Sci 21, Severance Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Inst Gastroenterol, Seoul, South Korea
[6] NHIC Ilsan Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Goyang Shi, Gyonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; liver neoplasms; iron oxides; mangafodipir; contrast media;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20174
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the mangafodipir-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced images for their ability to detect and characterize focal hepatic lesions. Materials and Methods: Unenhanced, mangafodipir-enhanced, and SPIO-enhanced hepatic MR images obtained from 64 patients were analyzed. A total of 121 hepatic lesions were included: 66 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 26 metastases, 14 hemangiomas, 5 cysts, 3 cholangiocarcinomas, 4 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs), 2 abscesses, and 1 adenoma. Two radiologists independently reviewed the two sets of images in a random order: 1) the unenhanced and mangafodipir-enhanced images (the mangafodipir set) and 2) the unenhanced and SPIO-enhanced images (the SPIO set). This study compared the accuracy of lesion detection, the ability to distinguish between a benign and malignant lesion, and the ability to distinguish between the hepatocellular and non-hepatocellular origins of the lesions using the areas (Az) under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The overall accuracy for detecting focal lesions was significantly higher (P<0.05) with the SPIO set (Az = 0.846 and 0.871 for readers 1 and 2, respectively) than with the mangafodipir set (Az = 0.716 and 0.766). Most of the lesions detected only with the SPIO-enhanced MR images by the readers were small HCCs. For lesions larger than 15 mm, the sensitivities of the two contrast enhancement techniques were similar for both readers. The accuracy of the mangafodipir and SPIO sets in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions was comparable. The accuracy for distinguishing between the hepatocellular and non-hepatocellular origins of the lesions was significantly higher (P<0.05) using the mangafodipir set (Az = 0.897 and 0.946) than using the SPIO set (Az = 0.741 and 0.833). Conclusion: SPIO- and mangafodipir-enhanced images were comparable for detection of focal hepatic lesions other than small HCCs, which were better detected on the SPIO-enhanced images. Mangafodipir-enhanced images are likely better than the SPIO-enhanced images for distinguishing between focal liver lesions with a hepatocellular or nonhepatocellular origin.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 621
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Focal hepatic lesions: Detection and characterization with combination gadolinium- and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging
    Kim, MJ
    Kim, JH
    Chung, JJ
    Park, MS
    Lim, LS
    Oh, YT
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (03) : 719 - 726
  • [2] Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for focal hepatic lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, You-Wei
    Chen, Zheng-Guang
    Wang, Ji-Chen
    Zhang, Zong-Ming
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (14) : 4334 - 4344
  • [3] Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for focal hepatic lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    You-Wei Li
    Zheng-Guang Chen
    Ji-Chen Wang
    Zong-Ming Zhang
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, (14) : 4334 - 4344
  • [4] Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging - Comparison of 1.5 T and 3.0 T imaging for detection of focal malignant liver lesions
    Chang, JM
    Lee, JM
    Lee, MW
    Choi, JY
    Kim, SH
    Lee, JY
    Han, JK
    Choi, BI
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [5] MRI with superparamagnetic iron oxide: Efficacy in the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions
    Poeckler-Schoeniger, C
    Koepke, J
    Gueckel, F
    Sturm, J
    Georgi, M
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (03) : 383 - 392
  • [6] Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging for focal hepatic lesions: a comparison with CT during arterioportography plus CT during hepatic arteriography
    Akihiro Tanimoto
    Go Wakabayashi
    Hiroshi Shinmoto
    Seishi Nakatsuka
    Shigeo Okuda
    Sachio Kuribayashi
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005, 40 : 371 - 380
  • [7] Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Case of Spleen Hamartoma
    Bulakci, Mesut
    Yilmaz, Erdem
    Yahyayev, Aghakishi
    Bulakci, Betul Bozkurt
    Yekeler, Ensar
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2013, 22 (03) : 301 - 303
  • [8] Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging for focal hepatic lesions: a comparison with CT during arterioportography plus CT during hepatic arteriography
    Tanimoto, A
    Wakabayashi, G
    Shinmoto, H
    Nakatsuka, S
    Okuda, S
    Kuribayashi, S
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 40 (04) : 371 - 380
  • [9] Evaluating the Severity of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis With Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Tornita, Kengo
    Tanimoto, Akihiro
    Irie, Rie
    Kikuchi, Masahiro
    Yokoyama, Hirokazu
    Teratani, Toshiaki
    Suzuki, Takahiro
    Taguchi, Takashi
    Noguchi, Masaaki
    Ohkura, Tamiko
    Hibi, Toshifumi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 28 (06) : 1444 - 1450
  • [10] Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance for imaging cardiac inflammation. A minireview
    Podrouzkova, Helena
    Feitova, Vera
    Panovsky, Roman
    Meluzin, Jaroslav
    Orban, Marek
    BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC, 2015, 159 (03): : 378 - 381