Revisiting Putnam's two-level game theory in the digital age: domestic digital diplomacy and the Iran nuclear deal

被引:44
作者
Bjola, Corneliu [1 ]
Manor, Ilan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Diplomat Studies, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
关键词
SOCIAL MEDIA ADOPTION; PUBLIC-OPINION; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/09557571.2018.1476836
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Few studies to date have investigated the impact of digitalization on Putnam's two-level game theory. Such an investigation is warranted given that state and non-state actors can employ digital tools to influence decision-making processes at both national and international levels. This study advances a new theoretical concept, Domestic Digital Diplomacy, which refers to the use of social media by a government to build domestic support for its foreign policy. This model is introduced through the case study of the @TheIranDeal twitter channel, a social media account launched by the Obama White House to rally domestic support for the ratification of the Iran Nuclear Agreement. The study demonstrates that digitalization has complicated the two-level game by democratizing access to foreign policy decisions and increasing interactions between the national and international levels of diplomacy.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 32
页数:30
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Acker Amelia, 2017, Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, V54, DOI 10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401001
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, TIME
[3]   Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government [J].
Bertot, John Carlo ;
Jaeger, Paul T. ;
Grimes, Justin M. .
TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT- PEOPLE PROCESS AND POLICY, 2012, 6 (01) :78-91
[4]   The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations [J].
Bertot, John Carlo ;
Jaeger, Paul T. ;
Hansen, Derek .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2012, 29 (01) :30-40
[5]  
Bjola C., 2015, Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, P71
[6]  
Bjola C., 2016, Global Affairs, V2, P297, DOI [10.1080/23340460.2016.1239372, DOI 10.1080/23340460.2016.1239372]
[7]  
Bjola Corneliu., 2016, Global Affairs, V2, P131, DOI [10.1080/23340460.2016.1182244, DOI 10.1080/23340460.2016.1182244]
[8]  
Boyer MarkA., 2000, Diplomacy Statecraft, V11, P185
[9]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[10]  
Clark WilliamRoberts., 2000, INT NEGOT, V5, P69