Comparative Effectiveness of Aggressive Versus Nonaggressive Treatment Among Men With Early-Stage Prostate Cancer and Differing Comorbid Disease Burdens at Diagnosis

被引:19
|
作者
Daskivich, Timothy J. [1 ]
Lai, Julie [2 ]
Dick, Andrew W. [2 ]
Setodji, Claude M. [2 ]
Hanley, Janet M. [2 ]
Litwin, Mark S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Saigal, Christopher [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
prostate; survival; comorbidity; outcomes; cancer; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; COMPETING RISKS; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; AGE;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.28757
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: This study sought to compare the effectiveness of aggressive versus nonaggressive treatment in reducing cancer-specific mortality for older men with early-stage prostate cancer across differing comorbid disease burdens at diagnosis. METHODS: In total, the authors sampled 140,553 men aged >= 66 years with early-stage prostate cancer who were diagnosed between 1991 and 2007 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Propensity-adjusted competing-risks regression analysis was used to compare the risk of cancer-specific mortality between men who received aggressive versus nonaggressive treatment among comorbidity subgroups. RESULTS: In propensity-adjusted competing-risks regression analysis, aggressive treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of cancer-specific mortality among men who had Charlson scores of 0, 1, and 2 but not among men who had Charlson scores >= 3 (subhazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-1.18). The absolute reduction in 15-year cancer-specific mortality between men who received aggressive versus nonaggressive treatment was 6.1%, 4.3%, 3.9%, and 0.9% for men with Charlson scores of 0, 1, 2, and >= 3, respectively. Among men who had well-differentiated and moderately-differentiated tumors, aggressive treatment again was associated with a lower risk of cancer-specific mortality for those who had Charlson scores of 0, 1, and 2 but not for those who had Charlson scores >= 3 (subhazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.89). The absolute reduction in 15-year cancer-specific mortality between men who received aggressive versus nonaggressive treatment was 3.8%, 3%, 1.9%, and -0.5% for men with Charlson scores of 0, 1, 2, and >= 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The cancer-specific survival benefit from aggressive treatment for early-stage prostate cancer diminishes with increasing comorbidity at diagnosis. Men with Charlson scores >= 3 garner no survival benefit from aggressive treatment. (C) 2014 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2432 / 2439
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF AGGRESSIVE VERSUS NON-AGGRESSIVE TREATMENT FOR MEN WITH EARLY-STAGE PROSTATE CANCER AND DIFFERING COMORBID DISEASE BURDENS AT DIAGNOSIS
    Daskivich, Timothy J.
    Lai, Julie
    Dick, Andrew W.
    Setodji, Claude M.
    Hanley, Janet
    Monica, Santa
    Litwin, Mark S.
    Saigal, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E17 - E17
  • [2] Questioning the 10-year Life Expectancy Rule for High-grade Prostate Cancer: Comparative Effectiveness of Aggressive vs Nonaggressive Treatment of High-grade Disease in Older Men With Differing Comorbid Disease Burdens
    Daskivich, Timothy J.
    Lai, Julie
    Dick, Andrew W.
    Setodji, Claude M.
    Hanley, Janet M.
    Litwin, Mark S.
    Saigal, Christopher
    UROLOGY, 2016, 93 : 68 - 74
  • [3] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF PARTIAL VERSUS RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH EARLY-STAGE KIDNEY CANCER
    Tan, Hung-Jui
    Norton, Edward C.
    Ye, Zaojun
    Hafez, Khaled S.
    Gore, John L.
    Miller, David C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E28 - E28
  • [4] Treatment of early-stage prostate cancer among rural and urban patients
    Baldwin, Laura-Mae
    Andrilla, C. Holly A.
    Porter, Michael P.
    Rosenblatt, Roger A.
    Patel, Shilpen
    Doescher, Mark P.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 (16) : 3067 - 3075
  • [5] Does age matter in the selection of treatment for men with early-stage prostate cancer?
    Konski, Andre
    Eisenberg, Debra
    Horwitz, Eric
    Hanlon, Alexandra
    Pollack, Alan
    Hanks, Gerald
    CANCER, 2006, 106 (12) : 2598 - 2602
  • [6] Toward Better Use of Bone Scans Among Men With Early-stage Prostate Cancer
    Merdan, Selin
    Womble, Paul R.
    Miller, David C.
    Barnett, Christine
    Ye, Zaojun
    Linsell, Susan M.
    Montie, James E.
    Denton, Brian T.
    UROLOGY, 2014, 84 (04) : 793 - 798
  • [7] Novel approaches to improve prostate cancer diagnosis and management in early-stage disease
    Marberger, Michael
    Barentsz, Jelle
    Emberton, Mark
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Loeb, Stacy
    Klotz, Laurence
    Koch, Michael
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Vickers, Andrew
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 : 1 - 7
  • [8] Disclosure of diagnosis and treatment among early stage prostate cancer survivors
    Jackson, Trent
    Davis, Kimberly
    Haisfield, Lisa
    Dawson, David
    Lynch, John
    Regan, James
    Kwart, Arnold
    Lynch, Barlow
    Taylor, Kathryn
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 79 (02) : 239 - 244
  • [9] Incomplete and inconsistent information provided to men making decisions for treatment of early-stage prostate cancer
    Snow, Stephanie L.
    Panton, Rachel L.
    Butler, Lorna J.
    Wilke, Derek R.
    Rutledge, Robert D. H.
    Bell, David G.
    Rendon, Ricardo A.
    UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (05) : 941 - 945
  • [10] Matching Tumor Risk With Aggressiveness of Treatment in Men With Multiple Comorbidities and Early-Stage Prostate Cancer
    Daskivich, Timothy J.
    Chamie, Karim
    Kwan, Lorna
    Dash, Atreya
    Greenfield, Sheldon
    Litwin, Mark S.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 (19) : 3446 - 3453