Image-Enhanced Endoscopy and Molecular Biomarkers Vs Seattle Protocol to Diagnose Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus

被引:10
作者
Vithayathil, Mathew [1 ]
Modolell, Ines [3 ]
Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo [4 ]
Oukrif, Dahmane [7 ]
Pappas, Apostolos [1 ]
Januszewicz, Wladyslaw [1 ,8 ]
O'Donovan, Maria [4 ]
Hadjinicolaou, Andreas [1 ,3 ]
Bianchi, Michele [1 ]
Blasko, Adrienn [1 ]
White, Jonathan [5 ]
Kaye, Philip [6 ]
Novelli, Marco [7 ]
Wernisch, Lorenz [2 ,9 ]
Ragunath, Krish [5 ]
di Pietro, Massimiliano [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, MRC, Canc Unit, Cambridge Biomed Campus,Box 197, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, MRC, Biostat Unit, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Hosp Natl Hlth Serv Fdn Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Cambridge Univ Hosp Natl Hlth Serv Fdn Trust, Dept Histopathol, Cambridge, England
[5] Natl Inst Hlth Res, Nottingham Digest Dis Ctr, Nottingham Biomed Res Ctr, Nottingham, England
[6] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Univ Hosp Natl Hlth Serv Trust, Dept Histopathol, Nottingham, England
[7] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Longdon, England
[8] Med Ctr Postgrad Educ, Dept Gastroenterol Hepatol & Clin Oncol, Warsaw, Poland
[9] BIOS Hlth Ltd, Cambridge, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Barrett's Esophagus; Esophageal Adenocarcinoma; Dysplasia; Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy; Autofluorescence; LOW-GRADE DYSPLASIA; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; ENDOMICROSCOPY; MANAGEMENT; NEOPLASIA; ADENOCARCINOMA; SURVEILLANCE; COMBINATION; MULTICENTER; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cgh.2022.01.060
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus often is invisible on high-resolution white-light endoscopy (HRWLE). We compared the diagnostic accuracy for inconspicuous dysplasia of the combination of autofluorescence imaging (AFI)-guided probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and molecular biomarkers vs HRWLE with Seattle protocol biopsies. METHODS: Barrett's esophagus patients with no dysplastic lesions were block-randomized to standard endoscopy (HRWLE with the Seattle protocol) or AFI-guided pCLE with targeted biopsies for molecular biomarkers (p53 and cyclin A by immunohistochemistry; aneuploidy by image cytometry), with crossover to the other arm after 6 to 12 weeks. The primary end point was the histologic diagnosis from all study biopsies (trial histology). A sensitivity analysis was performed for overall histology, which included diagnoses within 12 months from the first study endoscopy. Endoscopists were blinded to the referral endoscopy and histology results. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy for dysplasia by real-time pCLE vs HRWLE biopsies. RESULTS: Of 154 patients recruited, 134 completed both arms. In the primary outcome analysis (trial histology analysis), AFI-guided pCLE had similar sensitivity for dysplasia compared with standard endoscopy (74.3%; 95% CI, 56.7-87.5 vs 80.0%; 95% CI, 63.1-91.6; P = .48). Multivariate logistic regression showed pCLE optical dysplasia, aberrant p53, and aneuploidy had the strongest correlation with dysplasia (secondary outcome). This 3-biomarker panel had higher sensitivity for any grade of dysplasia than the Seattle protocol (81.5% vs 51.9%; P <.001) in the overall histology analysis, but not in the trial histology analysis (91.4% vs 80.0%; P=.16), with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: Seattle protocol biopsies miss dysplasia in approximately half of patients with inconspicuous neoplasia. AFI-guided pCLE has similar accuracy to the current gold standard. The addition of molecular biomarkers could improve diagnostic accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:2514 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Systematic assessment with I-SCAN magnification endoscopy and acetic acid improves dysplasia detection in patients with Barrett's esophagus
    Lipman, Gideon
    Bisschops, Raf
    Sehgal, Vinay
    Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo
    Sweis, Rami
    Esteban, Jose M.
    Hamoudi, Rifat
    Banks, Matthew R.
    Ragunath, Krish
    Lovat, Laurence B.
    Haidry, Rehan J.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (12) : 1219 - 1228
  • [32] Endoscopy-Driven Pretraining for Classification of Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus with Endoscopic Narrow-Band Imaging Zoom Videos
    van der Putten, Joost
    Struyvenberg, Maarten
    de Groof, Jeroen
    Curvers, Wouter
    Schoon, Erik
    Baldaque-Silva, Francisco
    Bergman, Jacques
    van der Sommen, Fons
    de With, Peter H. N.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [33] Is there an advantage to be gained from adding digital image cytometry of brush cytology to a standard biopsy protocol in patients with Barrett's esophagus?
    Borovicka, J.
    Schoenegg, R.
    Hell, M.
    Kradolfer, D.
    Bauerfeind, P.
    Dorta, G.
    Netzer, P.
    Binek, J.
    Meyenberger, C.
    Fischer, J. E.
    Spieler, P.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (05) : 409 - 414
  • [34] Risk prediction in Barrett's esophagus - aspects of a combination of molecular and epidemiologic biomarkers reflecting alterations of the microenvironment
    Brandtner, Anna K.
    Quante, Michael
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 76 : S63 - S69
  • [35] Real-time depth-resolved Raman Endoscopy For In Vivo Diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus
    Bergholt, Mads Sylvest
    Zheng, Wei
    Ho, Khek Yu
    Yeoh, Khay Guan
    Teh, Ming
    So, Jimmy Bok Yan
    Huang, Zhiwei
    OPTICAL FIBERS AND SENSORS FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS AND TREATMENT APPLICATIONS XIII, 2013, 8576
  • [36] Validation and optimization of enhanced volumetric laser endomicroscopy scoring systems for Barrett's esophagus dysplasia
    Kahn, Allon
    Kamboj, Amrit K.
    Trindade, Arvind J.
    Buras, Matthew R.
    Golafshar, Michael A.
    Iyer, Prasad G.
    Wang, Kenneth K.
    Leggett, Cadman L.
    TECHNIQUES AND INNOVATIONS IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 22 (04): : 185 - 190
  • [37] Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol
    Alshelleh, Mohammad
    Inamdar, Sumant
    McKinley, Matthew
    Stewart, Molly
    Novak, Jeffrey S.
    Greenberg, Ronald E.
    Sultan, Keith
    Devito, Bethany
    Cheung, Mary
    Cerulli, Maurice A.
    Miller, Larry S.
    Sejpal, Divyesh V.
    Vegesna, Anil K.
    Trindade, Arvind J.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 88 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [38] Genetic Biomarkers of Barrett’s Esophagus Susceptibility and Progression to Dysplasia and Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    John M. Findlay
    Mark R. Middleton
    Ian Tomlinson
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2016, 61 : 25 - 38
  • [39] Multiple-Band Imaging Provides Better Value Than White-light Endoscopy in Detection of Dysplasia in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus
    Bratlie, Svein Olav
    Johnsson, Erik
    Jonsson, Claes
    Fandriks, Lars
    Edebo, Anders
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 13 (06) : 1068 - +
  • [40] Candidate serum metabolite biomarkers for differentiating gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus, and high-grade dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Buas, Matthew F.
    Gu, Haiwei
    Djukovic, Danijel
    Zhu, Jiangjiang
    Onstad, Lynn
    Reid, Brian J.
    Raftery, Daniel
    Vaughan, Thomas L.
    METABOLOMICS, 2017, 13 (03)