Exergy efficiency graphs for thermal power plants

被引:19
作者
Taillon, J. [1 ]
Blanchard, R. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] ANDRITZ, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Loughborough Univ Technol, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
关键词
Exergy; Energy; Efficiency; Graphs; Cogeneration; Biomass; 1ST; BIOMASS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.055
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the strong support for exergy in thermodynamics, the industry still relies on energy based power plant efficiencies. The paper exposes errors with energy based efficiencies and improves the graphical representation of plants efficiencies. Among others, energy efficiencies cannot recognised that Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant may be less efficient than condensing plants or that fossil fuel based plants should always be more efficient than any biomass plants because irreversibilities from biomass spontaneous thermo-chemical reactions are much higher than with coal or natural gas. Profitability equations fail to distinguish the true technical efficiency so exergy must be used, if only to enhance power plants understanding. Two novel graphs are introduced. Graph #1 combines all in a single graph; total, electrical and thermal exergy efficiencies. Graph #2 splits thermal exergy efficiency into two components related to; plant thermal losses and useful heat output quality. Data from 24 existing and design plants is used to support the graphs. Graph #1 shows different rankings of efficiencies than what is typically understood by the industry. Graph #2 shows that achieving further higher thermal energy efficiency barely increases the total exergy efficiency. If possible, it is better to increase the useful heat output quality. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 66
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] First and second law analysis of diesel engine powered cogeneration systems
    Abusoglu, Aysegul
    Kanoglu, Mehmet
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 49 (08) : 2026 - 2031
  • [2] Academy Khan, GIBBS FREE ENERGY SP
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2013: IEA Input to the Clean Energy Ministerial, OECD/IEA
  • [4] On the Teaching of Performance Evaluation and Assessment of a Combined Cycle Cogeneration System
    Arnas, A. Oezer
    Boettner, Daisie D.
    Norberg, Seth A.
    Tamm, Gunnar
    Whipple, Jason R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2009, 131 (02): : 0255011 - 0255017
  • [5] Exergetic analysis of an innovative small scale combined cycle cogeneration system
    Badami, M.
    Mura, M.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2010, 35 (06) : 2535 - 2543
  • [6] Barry Cullen, 2009, J ENERGY RESOUR TECH, V131
  • [7] Bauen A, 2009, BIOENERGY SUSTAINABL
  • [8] COGEN Europe, 2013, WHAT IS COG
  • [9] ANALYSIS OF WOOD COMBUSTION BASED ON THE 1ST AND 2ND LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS
    DADKHAHNIKOO, A
    BUSHNELL, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1987, 109 (03): : 129 - 141
  • [10] Dunbar W.R., 1991, ASME AES, V25, P81