Interarm Blood Pressure Difference in People With Diabetes: Measurement and Vascular and Mortality Implications A Cohort Study

被引:58
作者
Clark, Christopher E. [1 ]
Steele, Anna M. [2 ,3 ]
Taylor, Rod S. [1 ]
Shore, Angela C. [2 ,3 ]
Ukoumunne, Obioha C. [4 ]
Campbell, John L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Inst Hlth Serv Res, Primary Care Res Grp, Exeter, Devon, England
[2] Royal Devon & Exeter Hosp, NIHR Exeter Clin Res Facil, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Peninsula Collaborat Leadership Appl Hlth Res & C, Exeter, Devon, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; ARM DIFFERENCES; DISEASE; HYPERTENSION; VARIABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2337/dc13-1576
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE Differences in blood pressure between arms are associated with vascular disease and increased mortality; this has not been reported in diabetes. We explored these associations, and assessed reference standard and pragmatic measurement techniques, in people with diabetes and in nondiabetic controls. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A prospective cohort study in Devon, England, recruited 727 people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and 285 nondiabetic controls. Simultaneous repeated measurements of bilateral blood pressure were made at recruitment. Data were used to inform a pragmatic measurement strategy. Interarm differences were examined for cross-sectional associations with target organ disease and prospective mortality associations (median follow-up 52 months). RESULTS We found 8.6% of participants with diabetes and 2.9% of controls had systolic interarm differences >= 10 mmHg. Single pairs of blood pressure measurements had high negative predictive values (97-99%) for excluding interarm differences. Systolic interarm differences >= 10 mmHg in diabetes were associated with peripheral arterial disease (odds ratio [OR] 3.4 [95% CI 1.2-9.3]). Differences 15 mmHg were associated with diabetic retinopathy (OR 5.7 [1.5-21.6]) and chronic kidney disease (OR 7.0 [1.7-29.8]). Systolic interarm differences were associated prospectively with increased cardiovascular mortality: hazard ratios 3.5 (1.0-13.0) for 10 mmHg and 9.0 (2.0-41.0) for 15 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS Blood pressure should be measured in both arms during initial assessment in diabetes. Systolic interarm differences can be excluded with a single pair of measurements. In the population with diabetes, systolic differences may be associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:1613 / 1620
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   PARTIAL RESIDUALS FOR THE PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS REGRESSION-MODEL [J].
SCHOENFELD, D .
BIOMETRIKA, 1982, 69 (01) :239-241
[32]   Four-Limb Blood Pressure as Predictors of Mortality in Elderly Chinese [J].
Sheng, Chang-Sheng ;
Liu, Ming ;
Zeng, Wei-Fang ;
Huang, Qi-Fang ;
Li, Yan ;
Wang, Ji-Guang .
HYPERTENSION, 2013, 61 (06) :1155-+
[33]  
Stearne MR, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P703
[34]   Automated blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Stergiou, George S. ;
Kollias, Anastasios ;
Destounis, Antonios ;
Tzamouranis, Dimitrios .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2012, 30 (11) :2074-2082
[35]   Association of Interarm Systolic Blood Pressure Difference with Atherosclerosis and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy [J].
Su, Ho-Ming ;
Lin, Tsung-Hsien ;
Hsu, Po-Chao ;
Chu, Chun-Yuan ;
Lee, Wen-Hsien ;
Chen, Szu-Chia ;
Lee, Chee-Siong ;
Voon, Wen-Chol ;
Lai, Wen-Ter ;
Sheu, Sheng-Hsiung .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08)
[36]  
Tabachnick B.G., 2001, SAS for windows workbook for Tabachnick and Fidell: using multivariate statistics
[37]  
Verberk WJ, 2012, EXPERT REV MED DEVIC, V9, P635, DOI [10.1586/ERD.12.46, 10.1586/erd.12.46]
[38]   Blood Pressure Measurement Method and Inter-Arm Differences: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Verberk, Willem J. ;
Kessels, Alfons G. H. ;
Thien, Theo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2011, 24 (11) :1201-1208
[39]   Hypertension in the young - Preventing the evolution of disease versus prevention of clinical events [J].
Williams, Bryan .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 50 (09) :840-842