A scoping review of the application of the SAMR model in research

被引:31
作者
Blundell, Christopher N. [1 ]
Mukherjee, Michelle [1 ]
Nykvist, Shaun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Teacher Educ & Leadership, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Teacher Educ, Trondheim, Norway
来源
COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION OPEN | 2022年 / 3卷
关键词
Teaching/learning strategies; SAMR; Scoping review; Early years education; Elementary education; Secondary education; Post-secondary education; TEACHERS USE; TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICS; STUDENTS; SCHOOLS; ICT; INTEGRATION; ACCEPTANCE; ENGAGEMENT; PEDAGOGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100093
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Puentedura's (2009, 2020) SAMR model is widely used in research publications to describe and categorise the integration of digital technologies in educational practices. However, this use of SAMR has not been comprehensively reviewed, and variations in categorisation of apparently similar educational practices indicates the need for a rigorous investigation. To address this, a scoping review was conducted of 230 journal articles, conference proceedings, theses, books, and book sections published in English between 2009 and 2021 that explicitly link research findings from all formal educational settings to SAMR. The findings of this scoping review demonstrate how the SAMR model is used by researchers to categorise educational practices with digital technologies, specifically, that categorisation is based on the actions and roles of teachers and students. Instances of apparently similar actions that are categorised differently using SAMR indicate factors that may influence the model's application. SAMR does not acknowledge teachers' familiarity and prior practice with digital technologies, nor does it acknowledge the educational context. Based on these findings, we propose two ways to improve the application of SAMR.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 219 条
[1]  
Abbas B., 2016, Urban English Language Arts Teachers Stories of Technology Use: A Narrative Inquiry
[2]  
Adams K.C., 2015, The impact of the role of an instructional technology facilitator on teacher efficacy in classroom technology integration in two rural public schools in northwestern North Carolina
[3]   How and why academics do and do not use iPads for academic teaching? [J].
Aiyegbayo, Olaojo .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 46 (06) :1324-1332
[4]  
Alivi J.S., 2019, Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes, V2, P1, DOI [10.18860/jeasp.v2i2.7944, DOI 10.18860/JEASP.V2I2.7944]
[5]  
Andrei E., 2014, TESL Reporter, V47, P35
[6]  
Andrews K, 2017, BRIDGING RES TO PRAC
[7]  
Anjaniputra A.G., 2018, Indonesian EFL Journal, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.25134/IEFLJ.V4I2.1370
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, HELIYON, V59, DOI [10.1016/j, DOI 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2019.E01505]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, EXPLORING SPECIFIC F
[10]  
Arango Maria C., 2020, INT J POLYM MATER PO, V70, P1115, DOI [10.1080/00914037.2020.1785454, DOI 10.1080/00914037.2020.1785454, 10.1108/YC-03-2020-1110]