The NHDPlus dataset, watershed subdivision and SWAT model performance

被引:18
作者
Chiang, Li-Chi [1 ]
Yuan, Yongping [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl United Univ, Dept Civil & Disaster Prevent Engn, Miaoli 36003, Taiwan
[2] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, NERL ESD Landscape Ecol Branch, Las Vegas, NV 89193 USA
来源
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES | 2015年 / 60卷 / 10期
基金
美国国家环境保护局;
关键词
SWAT simulation; NHDPlus; watershed subdivision; HRU definition; runoff; sediment; total nitrogen; CALIBRATION; SIMULATION; SEDIMENT; SENSITIVITY; VALIDATION; MULTISITE; SCENARIOS; IMPACTS; BASIN; TEXAS;
D O I
10.1080/02626667.2014.916408
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) has been developed to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural management practices on watershed water quality. Many studies have indicated that watershed subdivision can affect the accuracy of model predictions. Most of them used the minimum drainage area (MDA) to delineate sub-watersheds, and varied the value of MDA depending on the size of the watershed being modelled. Instead of MDA, we use the National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus)-an integration of the best features of the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD), National Elevation Dataset (NED), and the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD)-to delineate the watershed. The Kaskaskia River watershed in Illinois, USA, was selected to investigate the individual effects of sub-watershed and hydrologic response unit (HRU) delineations on predicted streamflow, total suspended sediment (TSS) and total nitrogen (TN) losses at two USGS gauges. In addition, an MDA of 3000 ha, and four levels of stream (the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th order) were evaluated. Three levels of HRU threshold (5%, 10% and 15%) were used for each stream order model. The results show that stream order had little effect on predicted streamflow, but a great impact on TSS and TN losses, and the impact of HRU delineation became greater when a higher stream order was used to delineate the watershed. For higher stream order, fewer streams were recognized in SWAT simulations, which resulted in less sediment routing and channel processes, which, in turn, led to less deposition in the channels; thus high sediment losses were obtained at the watershed outlet. However, fewer channel processes led to less in-stream N processes; thus lower TN losses. Overall, the SWAT simulations performed the best when the 2nd stream order was used for delineations comparing with USGS observed data, followed by the 3rd stream order. Therefore, to fully depict the watershed characteristics to perform SWAT simulations, a stream order higher than 3rd order is not recommended for watershed delineation.
引用
收藏
页码:1690 / 1708
页数:19
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, NAT ENG HDB
[2]   Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Srinivasan, R ;
Muttiah, RS ;
Williams, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01) :73-89
[3]  
Arnold JG, 1999, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V39, P121, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00044-X
[4]  
Baskaran L., 2009, 2009 INT SWAT C P
[5]  
Bingner RL, 1997, T ASAE, V40, P1329, DOI 10.13031/2013.21391
[6]   Multi-variable and multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT in a large mountainous catchment with high spatial variability [J].
Cao, WZ ;
Bowden, WB ;
Davie, T ;
Fenemor, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2006, 20 (05) :1057-1073
[7]   Predicting water, sediment and NO3-N loads under scenarios of land-use and management practices in a flat watershed [J].
Chaplot, V ;
Saleh, A ;
Jaynes, DB ;
Arnold, J .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2004, 154 (1-4) :271-293
[8]   Assessing SWAT's performance in the Kaskaskia River watershed as influenced by the number of calibration stations used [J].
Chiang, Li-Chi ;
Yuan, Yongping ;
Mehaffey, Megan ;
Jackson, Michael ;
Chaubey, Indrajeet .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (03) :676-687
[9]   Constructing retrospective gridded daily precipitation and temperature datasets for the conterminous United States [J].
Di Luzio, Mauro ;
Johnson, Gregory L. ;
Daly, Christopher ;
Eischeid, Jon K. ;
Arnold, Jeffrey G. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2008, 47 (02) :475-497
[10]   A hydrologic/water quality model application protocol [J].
Engel, Bernard ;
Storm, Dan ;
White, Mike ;
Arnold, Jeff ;
Arabi, Mazdak .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2007, 43 (05) :1223-1236