Development and clinical evaluation of a second-generation voice prosthesis (Provox((R))2), designed for anterograde and retrograde insertion

被引:71
作者
Hilgers, FJM
Ackerstaff, AH
Balm, AJM
Tan, IB
Aaronson, NK
Persson, JO
机构
[1] ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSP,NETHERLANDS CANC INST,DEPT PSYCHOSOCIAL RES & EPIDEMIOL,NL-1066 CX AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[2] ATOS MED,DEPT BIOMED ENGN & DEV,HORBY,SWEDEN
关键词
D O I
10.3109/00016489709114220
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Prosthetic voice restoration has considerably improved the results of vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy, and is presently the method of choice for many health-care providers treating laryngectomized patients. The Provox(R) voice prosthesis, developed in the Netherlands Cancer Institute, is an indwelling device that has been applied in recent years with regular success. Its retrograde replacement method, using a disposable guide wire, assures reliable, atraumatic positioning of the prosthesis in the tracheoesophageal fistula. However, the method sometimes may be uncomfortable for the patient; therefore an adapted prosthesis and new replacement equipment were developed, which enable bidirectional insertion, i.e. not only in the traditional retrograde manner through the pharynx, but especially in an anterograde manner through the stoma. This second-generation voice prosthesis (Provox(R)2) was studied in a prospective clinical trial in 44 patients (33 experienced patients, seven first-time replacements and four primary insertions). The study demonstrated that the anterograde insertion with the Provox(R)2 system was applicable in all patients, making the voice prosthesis even easier to handle than with the traditional retrograde method. A stenosis of the pharyngoesophageal segment no longer interfered with the replacement. In addition, the patients judged the new method as being favourable, reporting significantly less discomfort during the replacement procedure (paired Student's t-test: p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the adapted voice prosthesis could be removed from the tracheoesophagal fistula without excessive force (mean 7.9 N, range 6.0-14.0 N), more easily than the original Provox(R) (mean 20.9 N, range 5.5-25.0 N). It can be concluded that this second-generation indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox(R)2) seems to be a further improvement in the application of this voice rehabilitation system, not only simplifying the replacement procedure, but also diminishing the discomfort for the patient.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 896
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   COMMUNICATION, FUNCTIONAL-DISORDERS AND LIFE-STYLE CHANGES AFTER TOTAL LARYNGECTOMY [J].
ACKERSTAFF, AH ;
HILGERS, FJM ;
AARONSON, NK ;
BALM, AJM .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1994, 19 (04) :295-300
[2]  
Blom ED., 1996, Cancer of the head and neck, V3, P839
[3]   PROVOX(TM) VALVE USE FOR POSTLARYNGECTOMY VOICE REHABILITATION [J].
CALLANAN, V ;
GURR, P ;
BALDWIN, D ;
WHITETHOMPSON, M ;
BECKINSALE, J ;
BENNETT, J .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1995, 109 (11) :1068-1071
[4]   ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL VERSUS ESOPHAGEAL SPEECH [J].
DEBRUYNE, F ;
DELAERE, P ;
WOUTERS, J ;
UWENTS, P .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1994, 108 (04) :325-328
[5]   IN-VITRO COMPARISON OF THE GRONINGEN HIGH-RESISTANCE, GRONINGEN LOW-RESISTANCE AND PROVOX SPEAKING VALVES [J].
HEATON, JM ;
PARKER, AJ .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1994, 108 (04) :321-324
[6]   Speech assessment of patients using three types of indwelling tracheo-oesophageal voice prostheses [J].
Heaton, JM ;
Sanderson, D ;
Dunsmore, IR ;
Parker, AJ .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1996, 110 (04) :343-347
[7]  
HEATON JM, 1995, ACTA OTOLARYNGOL, V114, P675
[8]   LONG-TERM RESULTS OF VOCAL REHABILITATION AFTER TOTAL LARYNGECTOMY WITH THE LOW-RESISTANCE, INDWELLING PROVOX(TM) VOICE PROSTHESIS SYSTEM [J].
HILGERS, FJM ;
BALM, AJM .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1993, 18 (06) :517-523
[9]  
HILGERS FJM, 1993, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V250, P375
[10]  
HILGERS FJM, 1994, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL, V19, P174, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1994.tb01206.x