MRI-derived PRECISE scores for predicting pathologically-confirmed radiological progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance

被引:53
作者
Caglic, Iztok [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sushentsev, Nikita [2 ,3 ]
Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Sala, Evis [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shaida, Nadeem [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Koo, Brendan C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kozlov, Vasily [7 ]
Warren, Anne Y. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Kastner, Christof [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Barrett, Tristan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, CamPARI Prostate Canc Grp, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[3] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[4] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Urol, Cambridge, England
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Surg, Acad Urol Grp, Cambridge, England
[6] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Urol Translat Res & Clin Trials Off, Biomed Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[7] Sechenov First Moscow State Med Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Healthcare Org, Moscow, Russia
[8] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Pathol, Cambridge, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Prostate cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Active surveillance; DISEASE RECLASSIFICATION; SELECTION; NEED;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-07336-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the predictive value and correlation to pathological progression of the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scoring system in the follow-up of prostate cancer (PCa) patients on active surveillance (AS). Methods A total of 295 men enrolled on an AS programme between 2011 and 2018 were included. Baseline multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was performed at AS entry to guide biopsy. The follow-up mpMRI studies were prospectively reported by two sub-specialist uroradiologists with 10 years and 13 years of experience. PRECISE scores were dichotomized at the cut-off value of 4, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Diagnostic performance was further quantified by using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) which was based on the results of targeted MRI-US fusion biopsy. Univariate analysis using Cox regression was performed to assess which baseline clinical and mpMRI parameters were related to disease progression on AS. Results Progression rate of the cohort was 13.9% (41/295) over a median follow-up of 52 months. With a cut-off value of category >= 4, the PRECISE scoring system showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for predicting progression on AS of 0.76, 0.89, 0.52 and 0.96, respectively. The AUC was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.74-0.90). Prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D), Likert lesion score and index lesion size were the only significant baseline predictors of progression (each p < 0.05). Conclusion The PRECISE scoring system showed good overall performance, and the high NPV may help limit the number of follow-up biopsies required in patients on AS.
引用
收藏
页码:2696 / 2705
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, PROST CANC DIAGN MAN
  • [3] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [4] Three-year experience of a dedicated prostate mpMRI pre-biopsy programme and effect on timed cancer diagnostic pathways
    Barrett, T.
    Slough, R.
    Sushentsev, N.
    Shaida, N.
    Koo, B. C.
    Caglic, I.
    Kozlov, V.
    Warren, A. Y.
    Thankappannair, V.
    Pinnock, C.
    Shah, N.
    Saeb-Parsy, K.
    Gnanapragasam, V. J.
    Sala, E.
    Kastner, C.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) : 894.e1 - 894.e9
  • [5] PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI
    Barrett, T.
    Rajesh, A.
    Rosenkrantz, A. B.
    Choyke, P. L.
    Turkbey, B.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) : 841 - 852
  • [6] PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know
    Barrett, T.
    Turkbey, B.
    Choyke, P. L.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (11) : 1165 - 1176
  • [7] Billis Athanase, 2011, Int. braz j urol., V37, P278, DOI 10.1590/S1677-55382011000200021
  • [8] Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Alberts, Arnout R.
    Rannikko, Antti
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Pickles, Tom
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (05) : 814 - 821
  • [9] Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2018
    Briganti, Alberto
    Fossati, Nicola
    Catto, James W. F.
    Cornford, Philip
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Wirth, Manfred
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (03) : 357 - 368
  • [10] Multiparametric MRI - local staging of prostate cancer and beyond
    Caglic, Iztok
    Kovac, Viljem
    Barrett, Tristan
    [J]. RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 53 (02) : 159 - 170