Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale

被引:23
作者
Roy, Jean-Sebastien [1 ,2 ]
Esculier, Jean-Francois [2 ]
Maltais, Desiree B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Rehabil, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[2] Quebec Rehabil Inst, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Rehabil & Social Integr, Quebec City, PQ G3A 0B4, Canada
关键词
Knee; outcome assessment; questionnaires; reliability and validity; responsiveness to change; PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN; RESPONSIVENESS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1177/0269215513511342
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Activities of Daily Living Scale of the Knee Outcome Survey (KOS-ADLS) is a joint-specific questionnaire measuring functional limitation experienced by individuals with knee disorders. The original English version of the KOS-ADLS has been shown to be highly reliable and responsive to change. The purpose of this study was to perform a translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original version of the KOS-ADLS questionnaire into French and to validate this French version of the questionnaire. Method: In accordance with standard procedure, the original version of the KOS-ADLS was translated and cross-culturally adapted into French. Once the final French version of the KOS-ADLS was developed, it was subjected to further psychometric evaluation with 76 individuals with knee disorders. Each participant completed the KOS-ADLS on three occasions: at baseline, two days later to evaluate test-retest reliability, and four weeks later to evaluate responsiveness. Symptoms and function-oriented construct questions were also completed to evaluate construct-convergent and known-group validity. Results: The cross-cultural adaptation procedure revealed no major problems with content or language. The French version of the KOS-ADLS showed excellent test-retest reliability with low measurement error (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92, minimal detectable change = 8.3), as well as high responsiveness (standardized response mean = 1.41; clinically important difference = 13.6). Further, it discriminates between different levels of self-rated or clinician-rated knee function. Conclusions: The French version of the KOS-ADLS is a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire for the assessment of functional limitation in individuals with musculoskeletal knee disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:614 / 623
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[2]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[3]   Development of a German version of the knee outcome survey for daily activities [J].
Bizzini, M. ;
Gorelick, M. .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2007, 127 (09) :781-789
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: Which are reliable and valid? [J].
Crossley, KM ;
Bennell, KL ;
Cowan, SM ;
Green, S .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (05) :815-822
[6]   EVALUATION OF SOFT FOOT ORTHOTICS IN THE TREATMENT OF PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME [J].
ENG, JJ ;
PIERRYNOWSKI, MR .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1993, 73 (02) :62-68
[7]   Psychometric evidence of self-reported questionnaires for patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review [J].
Esculier, Jean-Francois ;
Roy, Jean-Sebastien ;
Bouyer, Laurent Julien .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 35 (26) :2181-2190
[8]   Adaptation and Validation of Turkish Version of the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities for Daily Living Scale [J].
Evcik, Deniz ;
Ay, Saime ;
Ege, Aral ;
Turel, Aycan ;
Kavuncu, Vural .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (08) :2077-2082
[9]  
Finch E., 2002, Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures
[10]  
A guide to enhanced clinical decision making, V2nd, P26