Blockchain's Grand Promise for the Real Estate Sector: A Systematic Review

被引:8
作者
Saari, Anniina [1 ]
Junnila, Seppo [1 ]
Vimpari, Jussi [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Built Environm, Otakaari 4, Espoo 02150, Finland
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 23期
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
blockchain; blockchain merits; digitalization; real estate; land administration; property transactions; real estate investment; leasing; tokenization; smart contract; TECHNOLOGY; TOKENIZATION; MANAGEMENT; REGISTRATION; TRANSACTIONS; INTERNET; IMPACT; TRUST;
D O I
10.3390/app122311940
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
In recent years, blockchain technology has received increasing attention in the real estate literature. Moreover, recent evidence suggests that blockchains could provide some added benefits for the real estate sector even in the current hybrid settings, where blockchain is usually just an add-on to existing systems. This research provides an up-to-date and systematic understanding of blockchain's theoretical potential, pros, and cons for the real estate sector. The research aims to understand why and where to apply blockchain in real estate by conducting a systematic review that identified 296 relevant documents and performed a thematic content analysis. The identified blockchain adoption proposals were classified using standardized real estate vocabulary. Most of the literature focused on blockchain possibilities within land administration, followed by property transactions, real estate investment, leasing and renting, and real estate administration. However, real estate development and real estate maintenance did not appear as attractive real estate subsectors for blockchain. This paper provides a detailed analysis of blockchain technology's possibilities for each real estate subsector, i.e., blockchain merits, and discusses the pros and cons. Last, this review provides suggestions for future research directions.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 182 条
[1]  
Abergel T., 2019, GLOBAL STATUS REPORT
[2]  
Affognon L., 2022, P INT C E INFRASTRUC, P93
[3]  
Afzal A., 2019, The Lahore Journal of Economics, V24, P103, DOI [10.35536/lje.2019.v24.i1.a5, DOI 10.35536/LJE.2019.V24.I1.A5]
[4]   Real Estate Management via a Decentralized Blockchain Platform [J].
Ahmad, Iftikhar ;
Alqarni, Mohammed A. ;
Almazroi, Abdulwahab Ali ;
Alam, Laiba .
CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2021, 66 (02) :1813-1822
[5]   Opportunities and Barriers of Using Blockchain in Public Administration: The Case of Real Estate Registration in Kazakhstan [J].
Akhmetbek, Yerlan ;
Spacek, David .
NISPACEE JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY, 2021, 14 (02) :41-64
[6]   A survey on continuous authentication methods in Internet of Things environment [J].
Al-Naji, Fatimah Hussain ;
Zagrouba, Rachid .
COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 163 :109-133
[7]  
Al-Saqaf W., 2017, J CYBER POLICY, V2, P338, DOI DOI 10.1080/23738871.2017.1400084
[8]  
Ali T., 2020, PROC INT C ADV EMERG, P1
[9]  
Alisawi M., 2022, BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOG, P87
[10]   Novel blockchain reference model for government services: Dubai government case study [J].
Alketbi, Ahmed ;
Nasir, Qassim ;
Abu Talib, Manar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 11 (06) :1170-1191