Comparison of nanofiltration and high pressure ultrafiltration of cottage cheese whey and whey permeate

被引:0
作者
Vasiljevic, T [1 ]
Jelen, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Agr Food & Nutr Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
来源
MILCHWISSENSCHAFT-MILK SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL | 2000年 / 55卷 / 03期
关键词
whey; (nanofiltration; high pressure ultrafiltration);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
A DDS LAB-20 unit was used for ultrafiltration (UF) or nanofittration (NF) of cottage cheese whey and whey permeate at 3 different transmembrane pressures (10, 20 and 30 bars) at constant temperature, flow rate and osmotic pressure. The flux rate increased significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) with the pressure increase for NF, while it remained pressure-independent during high pressure UF (HPUF). The increased pressure resulted in substantial augmentation of the total solids rejection by the UF and NF membrane, ranging from 39.73 (+/-0.06) to 67.52% (+/- 1.87) during whey UF and 87.45 (+/- 0.36) to 96.16% (+/- 0.17%) during whey NF with the pressure rise from 10 to 30 bars. The presence of the secondary protein layer at HPUF of acid whey resulted in a significant effect (p less than or equal to 0.05), causing higher retention of the total solids. The rejection of the positively charged multivalent ions (Ca and Mg) was directly proportional to the pressure rise during whey UF. Retention of monovalent positive ions (Na and K) was affected only marginally. Phosphorus retention was the highest during whey UF trials, and its permeation ability increased 3 fold in the absence of whey proteins. During whey NF, the retention of all minerals increased significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) with the increase of the transmembrane pressure. Without the whey proteins present, all minerals experienced substantially higher retention at high pressure NF.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 149
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Partial deacidification and demineralization of cottage cheese whey by nanofiltration [J].
Barrantes, LD ;
Morr, CV .
JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1997, 62 (02) :338-341
[2]  
Cheryan M., 1998, Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook
[3]   DETERMINATION OF CALCIUM AND PHOSPHORUS IN MILK [J].
GAINES, TP ;
WEST, JW ;
MCALLISTER, JF .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1990, 51 (02) :207-213
[4]   NANOFILTRATION CONCENTRATION EFFECT ON THE EFFICACY OF LACTOSE CRYSTALLIZATION [J].
GUU, YK ;
ZALL, RR .
JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1992, 57 (03) :735-739
[5]  
HIDDINK J, 1978, NETH MILK DAIRY J, V32, P80
[6]   NANOFILTRATION - A NEW MEMBRANE PROCESSING APPLICATION FOR DEMINERALIZATION IN THE DAIRY-INDUSTRY [J].
JELEN, P .
CANADIAN INSTITUTE OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L INSTITUT CANADIEN DE SCIENCE ET TECHNOLOGIE ALIMENTAIRES, 1991, 24 (05) :200-202
[7]  
KELLY J, 1995, J SOC DAIRY TECHNOL, V48, P20, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0307.1995.tb02432.x
[8]   DESALINATION OF ACID CASEIN WHEY BY NANOFILTRATION [J].
KELLY, J ;
KELLY, P .
INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 1995, 5 (03) :291-303
[9]   CHANGES IN THE CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION DURING ULTRAFILTRATION OF SKIM MILK [J].
PREMARATNE, RJ ;
COUSIN, MA .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1991, 74 (03) :788-795
[10]  
Pulliainen TK, 1996, J AOAC INT, V79, P1408