Turbulent velocity structure in molecular clouds

被引:207
作者
Ossenkopf, V
Mac Low, MM
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Inst Phys 1, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[2] Amer Museum Nat Hist, Dept Astrophys, New York, NY 10024 USA
关键词
ISM : clouds; ISM : magnetic fields; turbulence; ISM : kinematics and dynamics; MHD;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:20020629
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We compare velocity structure observed in the Polaris Flare molecular cloud at scales ranging from 0.015 pc to 20 pc to the velocity structure of a suite of simulations of supersonic hydrodynamic and MHD turbulence computed with the ZEUS MHD code. We examine different methods of characterising the structure, including a scanning-beam method that provides an objective measurement of Larson's size-linewidth relation, structure functions, velocity and velocity difference probability distribution functions (PDFs), and the Delta-variance wavelet transform, and use them to compare models and observations. The Delta-variance is most sensitive to characteristic scales and scaling laws, but is limited in its application by a lack of intensity weighting so that its results are easily dominated by observational noise in maps with large empty areas. The scanning-beam size-linewidth relation is more robust with respect to noisy data. Obtaining the global velocity scaling behaviour requires that large-scale trends in the maps not be removed but treated as part of the turbulent cascade. We compare the true velocity PDF in our models to simulated observations of velocity centroids and average line profiles in optically thin lines, and find that the line profiles reflect the true PDF better unless the map size is comparable to the total line-of-sight thickness of the cloud. Comparison of line profiles to velocity centroid PDFs can thus be used to measure the line-of-sight depth of a cloud. The observed density and velocity structure is consistent with supersonic turbulence with a driving scale at or above the size of the molecular cloud and dissipative processes below 0.05 pc. Ambipolar diffusion could explain the dissipation. Over most of the observed range of scales the velocity structure is that of a shock-dominated medium driven from large scale. The velocity PDFs exclude small-scale driving such as that from stellar outflows as a dominant process in the observed region. In the models, large-scale driving is the only process that produces deviations from a Gaussian PDF shape consistent with observations, almost independent of the strength of driving or magnetic field. Strong magnetic fields impose a clear anisotropy on the velocity field, reducing the velocity variance in directions perpendicular to the field.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 326
页数:20
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   HIGH-ORDER VELOCITY STRUCTURE FUNCTIONS IN TURBULENT SHEAR FLOWS [J].
ANSELMET, F ;
GAGNE, Y ;
HOPFINGER, EJ ;
ANTONIA, RA .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1984, 140 (MAR) :63-89
[2]  
AVILLEZ MA, 2000, B AM ASTRON SOC, V196
[3]   Wave propagation in molecular clouds [J].
Balsara, DS .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 465 (02) :775-794
[4]   The IRAM key-project: Small-scale structure of pre-star forming regions III. Influence of and correction for the error beam pick-up [J].
Bensch, F ;
Panis, JF ;
Stutzki, J ;
Heithausen, A ;
Falgarone, E .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2001, 365 (02) :275-284
[5]   Quantification of molecular cloud structure using the Δ-variance [J].
Bensch, F ;
Stutzki, J ;
Ossenkopf, V .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2001, 366 (02) :636-650
[6]  
BRUNT C, 1999, THESIS U MASSACHUSET
[7]   THE LINE WIDTH-SIZE RELATION IN MASSIVE CLOUD CORES [J].
CASELLI, P ;
MYERS, PC .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 446 (02) :665-686
[8]  
CHAPPELL D, 1999, MNRAS, V310, P1
[9]  
CLARKE D, 1994, NCSA TECHNICAL REPOR
[10]   TURBULENCE IN MOLECULAR CLOUDS [J].
DUBINSKI, J ;
NARAYAN, R ;
PHILLIPS, TG .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 448 (01) :226-231