Rapid decisions from experience

被引:37
作者
Zeigenfuse, Matthew D. [1 ]
Pleskac, Timothy J. [2 ]
Liu, Taosheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Psychol Inst, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychol, E Lansing, MI 48864 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Decision making; Decisions from experience; Rank-dependent utility theory; Prospect theory; Sequential sampling; DRIFT-DIFFUSION MODEL; PROSPECT-THEORY; VISUAL FIXATIONS; LOSS AVERSION; FIELD-THEORY; RISK-TAKING; RARE EVENTS; CHOICE; ACCURACY; PROBABILITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.012
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In many everyday decisions, people quickly integrate noisy samples of information to form a preference among alternatives that offer uncertain rewards. Here, we investigated this decision process using the Flash Gambling Task (FGT), in which participants made a series of choices between a certain payoff and an uncertain alternative that produced a normal distribution of payoffs. For each choice, participants experienced the distribution of payoffs via rapid samples updated every 50 ms. We show that people can make these rapid decisions from experience and that the decision process is consistent with a sequential sampling process. Results also reveal a dissociation between these preferential decisions and equivalent perceptual decisions where participants had to determine which alternatives contained more dots on average. To account for this dissociation, we developed a sequential sampling rank-dependent utility model, which showed that participants in the FGT attended more to larger potential payoffs than participants in the perceptual task despite being given equivalent information. We discuss the implications of these findings in terms of computational models of preferential choice and a more complete understanding of experience-based decision making. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 194
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AMBIGUITY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Utility of gains and losses: Measurement-theoretical and experimental approaches
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1968, INFORM THEORY CHOICE, DOI DOI 10.1002/BS.3830140408
[5]   Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions [J].
Barron, G ;
Erev, I .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 16 (03) :215-233
[6]   EXPOSITION OF A NEW THEORY ON THE MEASUREMENT OF RISK [J].
Bernoulli, Daniel .
ECONOMETRICA, 1954, 22 (01) :23-36
[7]   Building bridges between neural models and complex decision making behaviour [J].
Busemeyer, Jerome R. ;
Jessup, Ryan K. ;
Johnson, Joseph G. ;
Townsend, James T. .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2006, 19 (08) :1047-1058
[8]   DECISION FIELD-THEORY - A DYNAMIC COGNITIVE APPROACH TO DECISION-MAKING IN AN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT [J].
BUSEMEYER, JR ;
TOWNSEND, JT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (03) :432-459
[10]   CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN A SEQUENTIAL DECISION-MAKING TASK [J].
BUSEMEYER, JR .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1982, 29 (02) :175-207