Integration of data-driven and physics-based modeling of wind waves in a shallow estuary

被引:22
作者
Wang, Nan [1 ]
Chen, Qin [2 ]
Zhu, Ling [1 ]
Sun, Hao [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 400 SN,360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 471 SN, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 419 SN,360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Artificial neural network; Regression tree; SWAN modeling; Wave prediction; Shallow estuary; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocemod.2022.101978
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Numerical models solving the wave action balance equation have been widely used to simulate wind waves. In-situ measurements, albeit sparse, are crucial to the calibration and validation of numerical wave models. In this study, a novel hybrid approach was developed by integrating a physics-based Simulating WAves Nearshore (SWAN) model with machine learning algorithms to predict wind waves in a shallow estuary. Two machine learning methods, bagged regression tree (BRT) and artificial neural network (ANN), were employed. It was found that the hybrid approach (BRT-SWAN) could be an efficient tool for modelers to identify sources of error and calibrate parameters in physics-based models. In this study, the wind direction and bottom friction coefficient were determined as the main factors causing errors in SWAN-simulated significant wave height and peak wave period, respectively. Furthermore, it turned out that BRT-SWAN-ANN (ANN trained with BRT- SWAN results) could achieve a similar level of accuracy to OBS-ANN (ANN trained with field observations of wind waves). Thus, the hybrid approach can be applied to estimate wave parameters, removing the limitation of using scarce observations in developing a predictive ANN model.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Battjes JA., 1978, P 16 INT C COAST ENG, P569, DOI [10.1061/9780872621909.034, DOI 10.1061/9780872621909.034]
[2]   A third-generation wave model for coastal regions - 1. Model description and validation [J].
Booij, N ;
Ris, RC ;
Holthuijsen, LH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1999, 104 (C4) :7649-7666
[3]  
Breiman L., 2017, Classification and Regression Trees, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9781315139470, 10.1201/9781315139470]
[4]   A case study of combined wave and water levels under storm conditions using WAM and SWAN in a shallow water application [J].
Brown, Jennifer M. .
OCEAN MODELLING, 2010, 35 (03) :215-229
[5]   Boussinesq modeling of wave transformation, breaking, and runup. II: 2D [J].
Chen, Q ;
Kirby, JT ;
Dalrymple, RA ;
Kennedy, AB ;
Chawla, A .
JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2000, 126 (01) :48-56
[6]   Prediction of wind waves in a shallow estuary [J].
Chen, Q ;
Zhao, HH ;
Hu, KL ;
Douglass, SL .
JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (04) :137-148
[7]   Significant wave height and energy flux prediction for marine energy applications: A grouping genetic algorithm - Extreme Learning Machine approach [J].
Cornejo-Bueno, L. ;
Nieto-Borge, J. C. ;
Garcia-Diaz, P. ;
Rodriguez, G. ;
Salcedo-Sanz, S. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 97 :380-389
[8]  
Couvillion B.B.R.B.R., 2011, US GEOL SURV SCI INV, V3164
[9]   An application of a machine learning algorithm to determine and describe error patterns within wave model output [J].
Ellenson, Ashley ;
Pei, Yuanli ;
Wilson, Gregory ;
Ozkan-Haller, H. Tuba ;
Fern, Xiaoli .
COASTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 157
[10]   Comparison between M5′ model tree and neural networks for prediction of significant wave height in Lake Superior [J].
Etemad-Shahidi, A. ;
Mahjoobi, J. .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2009, 36 (15-16) :1175-1181