Strategies to improve deep learning-based salivary gland segmentation

被引:11
作者
van Rooij, Ward [1 ]
Dahele, Max [1 ]
Nijhuis, Hanne [1 ]
Slotman, Berend J. [1 ]
Verbakel, Wilko F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Radiat Oncol, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Salivary glands; Segmentation; HEAD; DELINEATION; ORGANS;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-020-01721-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Deep learning-based delineation of organs-at-risk for radiotherapy purposes has been investigated to reduce the time-intensiveness and inter-/intra-observer variability associated with manual delineation. We systematically evaluated ways to improve the performance and reliability of deep learning for organ-at-risk segmentation, with the salivary glands as the paradigm. Improving deep learning performance is clinically relevant with applications ranging from the initial contouring process, to on-line adaptive radiotherapy. Methods Various experiments were designed: increasing the amount of training data (1) with original images, (2) with traditional data augmentation and (3) with domain-specific data augmentation; (4) the influence of data quality was tested by comparing training/testing on clinical versus curated contours, (5) the effect of using several custom cost functions was explored, and (6) patient-specific Hounsfield unit windowing was applied during inference; lastly, (7) the effect of model ensembles was analyzed. Model performance was measured with geometric parameters and model reliability with those parameters' variance. Results A positive effect was observed from increasing the (1) training set size, (2/3) data augmentation, (6) patient-specific Hounsfield unit windowing and (7) model ensembles. The effects of the strategies on performance diminished when the base model performance was already 'high'. The effect of combining all beneficial strategies was an increase in average Sorensen-Dice coefficient of about 4% and 3% and a decrease in standard deviation of about 1% and 1% for the submandibular and parotid gland, respectively. Conclusions A subset of the strategies that were investigated provided a positive effect on model performance and reliability. The clinical impact of such strategies would be an expected reduction in post-segmentation editing, which facilitates the adoption of deep learning for autonomous automated salivary gland segmentation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ARXIV180904430V1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ARXIV180102385
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ARXIV160606650V1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ARXIV14126980V9
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ARXIV171200409V1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CORR
[7]   CT-based delineation of organs at risk in the head and neck region: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG Oncology and TROG consensus guidelines [J].
Brouwer, Charlotte L. ;
Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M. ;
Bourhis, Jean ;
Budach, Wilfried ;
Grau, Cai ;
Gregoire, Vincent ;
van Herk, Marcel ;
Lee, Anne ;
Maingon, Philippe ;
Nutting, Chris ;
O'Sullivan, Brian ;
Porceddu, Sandro V. ;
Rosenthal, David I. ;
Sijtsema, Nanna M. ;
Langendijk, Johannes A. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 117 (01) :83-90
[8]   3D Variation in delineation of head and neck organs at risk [J].
Brouwer, Charlotte L. ;
Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M. ;
van den Heuvel, Edwin ;
Duppen, Joop C. ;
Navran, Arash ;
Bijl, Henk P. ;
Chouvalova, Olga ;
Burlage, Fred R. ;
Meertens, Harm ;
Langendijk, Johannes A. ;
van 't Veld, Aart A. .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7
[9]   RADIOTHERAPY DOSE-VOLUME EFFECTS ON SALIVARY GLAND FUNCTION [J].
Deasy, Joseph O. ;
Moiseenko, Vitali ;
Marks, Lawrence ;
Chao, K. S. Clifford ;
Nam, Jiho ;
Eisbruch, Avraham .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03) :S58-S63
[10]   Is accurate contouring of salivary and swallowing structures necessary to spare them in head and neck VMAT plans? [J].
Delaney, Alexander R. ;
Dahele, Max ;
Slotman, Ben J. ;
Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 (02) :190-196