Effects of applied contact force and volume control setting on output force levels of the BAHA® Softband

被引:27
作者
Hodgetts, WE [1 ]
Scollie, SD
Swain, R
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Speech Pathol & Audiol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, Natl Ctr Audiol, London, ON, Canada
关键词
BAHA; bone-anchored hearing aid; Classic; 300; compact; output force level; Softband; headband; artificial mastoid; hearing aids; bone conduction; electromechanical output; preferred listening level;
D O I
10.1080/14992020600582133
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The BAHA (R) Softband has been developed to provide a transcutaneous anchor for a BAHA (R) until a child is a surgical candidate for the percutaneous BAHA (R) implant. We tested the objective output force level of the BAHA (R) Classic 300 and Compact connected to a Softband on an artificial mastoid to determine: (1) the effects of direct contact force on output force levels (dB); and (2) the required volume control setting to ensure audibility of speech (assuming an average adult reference equivalent threshold force level). Direct contact force was varied from 2 to 5 N in 1 N steps. Output force level increased with increasing contact force. However, the average increase was 3 dB or lower, suggesting that the contact force is of minor importance. Volume control setting appears to be of much greater importance. It is suggested that the volume setting of either device be set to at least 2.5 to ensure audibility of conversational speech. Data from normal-hearing adults with simulated conductive hearing losses are presented to validate this conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 308
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
American Academy of Audiology, 2003, PED AMPL PROT
[2]  
ANSI, 1997, S351997 ANSIASA
[3]   Comparison of severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children's amplification preferences with the NAL-RP and the DSL 3.0 prescriptions [J].
Ching, TYC ;
Newall, P ;
Wigney, D .
SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1997, 26 (04) :219-222
[4]  
Cox R. M., 1982, VANDERBILT HEARING A, P78
[5]   PREDICTION OF HEARING-AID BENEFIT - THE ROLE OF PREFERRED LISTENING LEVELS [J].
COX, RM ;
ALEXANDER, GC .
EAR AND HEARING, 1994, 15 (01) :22-29
[6]   PREFERRED HEARING-AID GAIN IN EVERYDAY ENVIRONMENTS [J].
COX, RM ;
ALEXANDER, GC .
EAR AND HEARING, 1991, 12 (02) :123-126
[7]   DISTRIBUTION OF SHORT-TERM RMS LEVELS IN CONVERSATIONAL SPEECH [J].
COX, RM ;
MATESICH, JS ;
MOORE, JN .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1988, 84 (03) :1100-1104
[8]  
COX RM, 1987, EAR HEARING S, V8
[9]   AUDIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF DEAF-CHILDREN [J].
ERBER, NP ;
ALENCEWICZ, CM .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1976, 41 (02) :256-267
[10]   EFFECTS OF STIMULUS-INTENSITY ON SPEECH-PERCEPTION BY DEAF-CHILDREN [J].
ERBER, NP ;
WITT, LH .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1977, 42 (02) :271-278