The Effects of Informational Complexity and Working Memory on Problem-Solving Efficiency

被引:8
|
作者
Hoffman, Bobby [1 ]
McCrudden, Matthew T. [2 ]
Schraw, Gregory [3 ]
Hartley, Kendall [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Educ Studies, Coll Educ, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Victoria Univ Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Univ Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
关键词
efficiency; problem solving; working memory;
D O I
10.1007/BF03025663
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigated the influence of informational complexity and working memory capacity oil problem-solving efficiency, We examined two predictions of the situational efficiency hypothesis, which states efficiency of problem solving varies as a function of situational constraints. One prediction is that informational complexity affects problem-solving efficiency. A second prediction is that working memory capacity affects problem-solving efficiency. Students completed a working memory task and solved abstract and concrete syllogisms. Participants solved abstract syllogisms more accurately than concrete syllogisms and spent more time solving abstract syllogisms. Thus participants demonstrated greater problem-solving efficiency when solving concrete syllogisms. Results indicate that there is a trade-off between problem-solving accuracy and problem-solving time when information differs with respect to informational complexity, a phenomenon we refer to as the efficiency paradox. Working memory capacity did not affect accuracy or efficiency. The results support the conclusion that problem-solving efficiency is situational and a function of the complexity of information. Educational implications and directions for future research are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of informational complexity and working memory on problem-solving efficiency
    Bobby Hoffman
    Matthew T. McCrudden
    Gregory Schraw
    Kendall Hartley
    Asia Pacific Education Review, 2008, 9
  • [2] The influence of self-efficacy and working memory capacity on problem-solving efficiency
    Hoffman, Bobby
    Schraw, Gregory
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 19 (01) : 91 - 100
  • [3] Working memory, visual-spatial-intelligence and their relationship to problem-solving
    Buehner, Markus
    Kroener, Stephan
    Ziegler, Matthias
    INTELLIGENCE, 2008, 36 (06) : 672 - 680
  • [4] Visual and spatial working memory in children with arithmetic and problem-solving learning difficulties
    Passolunghi, Maria Chiara
    Mammarella, Irene C.
    Del Torre, Elena
    PSICOLOGIA CLINICA DELLO SVILUPPO, 2011, 15 (03) : 573 - 596
  • [5] Complexity, problem-solving, sustainability and resilience
    Tainter, Joseph A.
    Taylor, Temis G.
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2014, 42 (02): : 168 - 181
  • [6] The role of working memory capacity in analytic and multiply-constrained problem-solving in demanding situations
    Ellis, Derek M.
    Ball, B. Hunter
    Kimpton, Nicole
    Brewer, Gene A.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 73 (06): : 920 - 928
  • [7] Executive functions and problem-solving-The contribution of inhibition, working memory, and cognitive flexibility to science problem-solving performance in elementary school students
    Schaefer, Jonas
    Reuter, Timo
    Leuchter, Miriam
    Karbach, Julia
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 244
  • [8] Problem-Solving Practices and Complexity in School Psychology
    John Brady
    William R. Espinosa
    Contemporary School Psychology, 2017, 21 (1) : 38 - 48
  • [9] What Mediates the Relationship Between Growth in Math Problem-Solving and Working Memory in English Language Learners?
    Swanson, H. Lee
    Arizmendi, Genesis D.
    Li, Jui-Teng
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 114 (07) : 1608 - 1632
  • [10] The Prediction of Problem-Solving Assessed Via Microworlds A Study on the Relative Relevance of Fluid Reasoning and Working Memory
    Greiff, Samuel
    Krkovic, Katarina
    Hautamaki, Jarkko
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2016, 32 (04) : 298 - 306