Incorporating Uncertainty and Decision Analysis into a Water-Sustainability Index

被引:13
作者
Linhoss, Anna [1 ]
Ballweber, J. D. Jeff [2 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Pickering Firm, Special Projects, Flowood, MS 39232 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Sustainability index; Water resources; Water demand; Water policy; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Uncertainty analysis; MULTICRITERIA ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSIS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; VULNERABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000554
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper describes the development and testing of a methodology to assess water vulnerability and stress called "Water Sustainability through Decision Analysis." This method uses multicriteria decision analysis to measure water sustainability through a multidisciplinary lense and includes measures of water availability, demand, and policy. Assessing water sustainability is ultimately a decision problem that involves multiple stakeholders and perspectives. Uncertainty is an important and often-overlooked aspect of water sustainability. To fill this critical knowledge gap, the water sustainability through decision analysis method accounts for the uncertainty in the input data and unknown decision-maker preferences using stochastic multicriteria decision analysis. Addressing the problem of uncertainty helps to calculate risk and bypasses the problem of unknown decision maker preferences without resorting to equal or arbitrary weights for measures of sustainability. The method is applied to eight states in the southeastern United States. Georgia ranked high in water sustainability and Texas ranked low. The results provide a single outranking index and also highlight actionable items that can improve each state's water sustainability. (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] The arctic water resource vulnerability index: An integrated assessment tool for community resilience and vulnerability with respect to freshwater
    Alessa, Lilian
    Kliskey, Andrew
    Lammers, Richard
    Arp, Chris
    White, Dan
    Hinzman, Larry
    Busey, Robert
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 42 (03) : 523 - 541
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, WATER RESOURCES SYST
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, REV WATER SCARCITY I
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2000, WORLD WATER 2025 GLO
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, VIRT WAT TRAD P INT
  • [6] Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission, 1990, ARK WAT PLAN
  • [7] Badr A.W., 2004, SOUTH CAROLINA WATER
  • [8] On undermining the science?
    Beven, Keith
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2006, 20 (14) : 3141 - 3146
  • [9] An integrated indicator based on basin hydrology, environment, life, and policy: The watershed sustainability index
    Chaves, Henrique M. L.
    Alipaz, Suzana
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (05) : 883 - 895
  • [10] Clemons J., 2004, Interstate water disputes: A road map for states