To know or not to know? Mentalization as protection from somatic complaints

Somatization processes are usually associated with a lack of insight or with emotional unawareness, especially in adolescents where the ability for self-reflection is beginning to mature. However, the extent to which different levels of insight explain variations in somatization remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate whether high-level emotional awareness (comprehension) but not low-level awareness (only attention) is needed to psychologically cope with suffering, thus leading to lower somatization. Specific predictions were: 1) High attention along with High comprehension will be associated with significantly lower frequency of somatic complaints than other combinations (Low attention and Low comprehension, or High attention but Low comprehension); 2) In absence of comprehension, no attention will be more optimal than attention only, because only-attention might work as an amplificatory of suffering without the possibility of processing it. Self-reports of meta-cognitive processes, somatization, and control variables were obtained from 264 adolescents from a non-clinical population (54.5% female; aged 12-18, M=14.7, SD=1.7). In line with expectations, results revealed significant differences in the effects of insight positions on somatization: Attention+Comprehension (M=4.9, SE=0.9) < Nothing (M=7.1, SE=0.3) < Only attention (M=8.9, SE=0.7). Compared to Nothing, Attention+comprehension was associated with significantly reduced somatic complaints (B=-2.2, p=0.03, 95% CI -4,1 to 0.2). However, Only attention was associated with increased somatic complaints compared to the other two conditions (B=1.8, p=0.03, 95% CI 0.2 to 3.4; B=4, CI 95% 1.6-6.3, p=0.001, respectively). This highlights the role of higher-order awareness (i.e., comprehension or clarity) in the processing of suffering and stresses its value in the adaptive coping of emotional distress.