Unreasonable Hope: A Critical Evaluation of Thomas Oord's Eschatology

被引:0
作者
McLaughlin, Ryan Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Siena Coll, Religious Studies Dept, 515 Loudon Rd, Albany, NY 12211 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/moth.12315
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
Drawing upon his theology of essential kenosis, Thomas Oord maintains that God can effect miracles, resurrect Jesus's body, and redeem the entire created order in a definitive victory over evil without using any form of coercion. The author explores Oord's theology in order to evaluate this claim. Based on the criteria of both internal consistency and rational viability, the author argues that Oord's notion of essential kenosis makes the bodily resurrection of Jesus an extreme case of good fortune for God and thoroughly undermines any reasonable hope in an eschatological future in which all creatures experience resurrection and redemption in an evil-free existence.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 274
页数:16
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Boyd Gregory, 2001, SATAN PROBLEM EVIL C, P181
  • [2] Distinctive thanatomicrobiome signatures found in the blood and internal organs of humans
    Can, Ismail
    Javan, Gulnaz T.
    Pozhitkov, Alexander E.
    Noble, Peter A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2014, 106 : 1 - 7
  • [3] Cobb J.B., 1976, Process theology: An introductory exposition
  • [4] Griffin David Ray, 2001, REENCHANTMENT SUPERN, P143
  • [5] Griffin David Ray, 2004, GOD POWER EVIL PROCE, P276
  • [6] Griffin David Ray, 2001, ENCOUNTERING EVIL LI, P119
  • [7] Hasker William., 2004, PROVIDENCE EVIL OPEN
  • [8] The Living Dead: Bacterial Community Structure of a Cadaver at the Onset and End of the Bloat Stage of Decomposition
    Hyde, Embriette R.
    Haarmann, Daniel P.
    Lynne, Aaron M.
    Bucheli, Sibyl R.
    Petrosino, Joseph F.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [9] Keener Craig S., 2011, MIRACLES CREDIBILITY, V1
  • [10] Keener Craig S., 2011, MIRACLES CREDIBILITY, V2