Pairwise Tests of Purchasing Power Parity

被引:32
作者
Pesaran, M. Hashem [2 ,3 ]
Smith, Ron P. [4 ]
Yamagata, Takashi [1 ]
Hvozdyk, Lyudmyla [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Fac Econ, CIMF, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Birkbeck Coll, Dept Econ, London, England
[5] Univ Cambridge, Judge Business Sch, CFAP, Cambridge, England
关键词
Cross-rates; Cross-section dependence; Pairwise approach; Panel data; Purchasing power parity; REAL EXCHANGE-RATE; UNIT-ROOT; PANELS; RATES; HYPOTHESIS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1080/07474930802473702
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Given nominal exchange rates and price data on N+1 countries indexed by i=0,1,2,, N, the standard procedure for testing purchasing power parity (PPP) is to apply unit root or stationarity tests to N real exchange rates all measured relative to a base country, 0, often taken to be the U.S. Such a procedure is sensitive to the choice of base country, ignores the information in all the other cross-rates and is subject to a high degree of cross-section dependence which has adverse effects on estimation and inference. In this article, we conduct a variety of unit root tests on all possible N(N+1)/2 real rates between pairs of the N+1 countries and estimate the proportion of the pairs that are stationary. This proportion can be consistently estimated even in the presence of cross-section dependence. We estimate this proportion using quarterly data on the real exchange rate for 50 countries over the period 1957-2001. The main substantive conclusion is that to reject the null of no adjustment to PPP requires sufficiently large disequilibria to move the real rate out of the band of inaction set by trade costs. In such cases, one can reject the null of no adjustment to PPP up to 90% of the time as compared to around 40% in the whole sample using a linear alternative and almost 60% using a nonlinear alternative.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 521
页数:27
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Trade costs [J].
Anderson, JE ;
van Wincoop, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2004, 42 (03) :691-751
[2]  
[Anonymous], J TIME SERIES ANAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, The Econometrics of Panel-Data Fundamentals and Recent Developments in Theory and Practice
[4]   Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models [J].
Bai, JS ;
Ng, S .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (01) :191-221
[5]   A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration [J].
Bai, JS ;
Ng, S .
ECONOMETRICA, 2004, 72 (04) :1127-1177
[6]   Tests for unit-root versus threshod specification with an application to the purchasing power parity relationship [J].
Bec, F ;
Ben Salem, M ;
Carrasco, M .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2004, 22 (04) :382-395
[7]   US real exchange rate fluctuations and relative price fluctuations [J].
Betts, Caroline M. ;
Kehoe, Timothy J. .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2006, 53 (07) :1297-1326
[8]  
CHOI I, 2006, PALGRAVE HDB ECONOME, V1, pCH14
[9]   Subsampling hypothesis tests for nonstationary panels with applications to exchange rates and stock prices [J].
Choi, In ;
Chue, Timothy K. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 22 (02) :233-264
[10]   Exchange rate puzzles: A tale of switching attractors [J].
De Grauwe, P ;
Grimaldi, M .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 50 (01) :1-33