Economic benefits of less restrictive regulation of advanced practice nurses in North Carolina

被引:24
作者
Conover, Chris [1 ]
Richards, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Duke Ctr Hlth Policy & Inequal Studies, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sanford Sch Publ Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
Health economics; Health reform; Legal/regulatory issues; Nurses; State/local issues; PRIMARY-CARE; PRACTITIONERS; MEDICARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.outlook.2015.05.009
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: With looming provider shortages and increased demand for health care, many states are looking for low-cost ways to alleviate the shortages. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the economic impact of less restrictive regulations for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) in North Carolina. Method: We use economic impact analysis to demonstrate the economic impacts of making state scope-of-practice regulations on APRNs less restrictive in North Carolina. Outcomes include economic output, value-added, payroll compensation, employment, and tax revenue for North Carolina and for various subregions. Discussion: If North Carolina adopted the same approach to APRN regulation as the least restrictive states, its economy will benefit from substantial increases in economic output and employment. The state will also see increases in tax revenue. Conclusions: In addition to substantially shrinking the size of projected physician shortages, allowing full scope-of-practice for APRNs will bring significant economic benefits to the state of North Carolina. Our analysis should be helpful to policy makers considering ways to deal with provider shortages.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 592
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 2010, NURS PRACT COST EFF
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, NURSING EC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PROJ SUPPL DEM PRIM
[4]   Primary Care: Proposed Solutions To The Physician Shortage Without Training More Physicians [J].
Bodenheimer, Thomas S. ;
Smith, Mark D. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2013, 32 (11) :1881-1886
[5]   Practice characteristics of primary care nurse practitioners and physicians [J].
Buerhaus, Peter I. ;
DesRoches, Catherine M. ;
Dittus, Robert ;
Donelan, Karen .
NURSING OUTLOOK, 2015, 63 (02) :144-153
[6]  
Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2014, OCC EMPL STAT QUER S
[7]   State regulation, payment policies, and nurse-midwife services [J].
Declercq, ER ;
Paine, LL ;
Simmes, DR ;
DeJoseph, JF .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1998, 17 (02) :190-200
[8]   Using Medicare data to assess nurse practitioner-provided care [J].
DesRoches, Catherine M. ;
Gaudet, Jennifer ;
Perloff, Jennifer ;
Donelan, Karen ;
Iezzoni, Lisa I. ;
Buerhaus, Peter .
NURSING OUTLOOK, 2013, 61 (06) :400-407
[9]   Nurse practitioners substituting for general practitioners: randomized controlled trial [J].
Dierick-van Daele, Angelique T. M. ;
Metsemakers, Job F. M. ;
Derckx, Emmy W. C. C. ;
Spreeuwenberg, Cor ;
Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M. .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 65 (02) :391-401
[10]   Perspectives of Physicians and Nurse Practitioners on Primary Care Practice [J].
Donelan, Karen ;
DesRoches, Catherine M. ;
Dittus, Robert S. ;
Buerhaus, Peter .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (20) :1898-1906