Complex High-Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Prophylactic Use of the Impella CP Ventricular Assist Device

被引:1
|
作者
van den Buijs, Deborah M. F. [1 ]
van den Brink, Floris S. [2 ,3 ]
Wilgenhof, Adriaan [4 ]
Zivelonghi, Carlo [4 ]
Verouden, Niels [1 ]
Knaapen, Paul [1 ]
Sjauw, Krischan D. [3 ]
Vermeersch, Paul [4 ]
Nap, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ, Med Ctr, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leids Univ, Med Ctr, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Zuid Holland, Netherlands
[3] Med Ctr Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
[4] Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium
来源
JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY | 2022年 / 34卷 / 09期
关键词
Impella CP; high-risk PCI; complex high-risk PCI; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; VASCULAR COMPLICATIONS; HEMODYNAMIC SUPPORT; FEASIBILITY; DISEASE; SURGERY; SAFETY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. Patients with complex coronary artery disease, concomitant cardiac disease, and multiple comorbidities are addressed as complex higher-risk indicated patients (CHIPs). Selecting a revascularization strategy in this population remains challenging. If coronary artery bypass grafting is deemed high risk or patients are considered inoperable, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the support of the Impella CP ventricular assist device (Abiomed) may be an attractive alternative. Methods. In this retrospective, multicenter study, we included consecutive patients undergoing Impella CP-facilitated complex high-risk PCI. All patients were discussed by the heart team and were declined for surgery. Additionally, periprocedural mechanical circulatory support was deemed necessary. We collected demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and mortality rates up to 30 days were evaluated. Results. A total of 27 patients (median age, 73 +/- 9.7 years; 74.1% men) were included in our study. The median SYNTAX score was 32 (range, 8-57) and EuroSCORE was 7.25% (range, 1.33-49.66; +/- 12.76%). Periprocedural hemodynamic instability was observed in 1 patient (3.7%). In-hospital combined with 30-day mortality was 7.4% (2/27). No repeat revascularization was necessary. MACE was observed in 10 patients (37.0%). Six patients (22.2%) had a major bleeding complication, of which 2 were related to Impella access site. Median Impella run time was 1.22 hours and there was no significant decrease in kidney function. Median admission time after PCI was 3 days (range, 1-23; +/- 4.76). Conclusions. The Impella CP system showed good feasibility and provided adequate hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI in this CHIP population.
引用
收藏
页码:E665 / E671
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Use of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device in High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Cardiogenic Shock
    Akhondi, Andre Babak
    Lee, Michael S.
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (2-4) : E144 - E149
  • [2] Percutaneous left ventricular assist device: "TandemHeart" for high-risk coronary intervention
    Aragon, J
    Lee, MS
    Kar, S
    Makkar, RR
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2005, 65 (03) : 346 - 352
  • [3] Intravascular Lithotripsy and Microaxial Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device for Complex and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Azzalini, Lorenzo
    Ancona, Marco B.
    Bellini, Barbara
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Carlino, Mauro
    Montorfano, Matteo
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 35 (07) : 940.e5 - 940.e7
  • [4] Trans-Aortic Percutaneous Heart Valve Deployment of Impella CP™ to Assist in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Chan, William
    Seidelin, Peter H.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2014, 23 (05): : E142 - E144
  • [5] Use of the Impella 2.5 in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    McCulloch, Brenda
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2011, 31 (01) : E1 - E16
  • [6] The Impella ventricular assist device: use in patients at high risk for coronary interventions: successful multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in a 62-year-old high-risk patient
    Marella, Punnaiah C.
    Lassetter, John E.
    Heuser, Richard R.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (01) : 69E9 - 69E12
  • [7] The effectiveness and safety of the Impella ventricular assist device for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review
    Ichou, Jamal Ait
    Larivee, Natasha
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    Suissa, Karine
    Filion, Kristian B.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 91 (07) : 1250 - 1260
  • [8] Left Ventricular Assist for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Jones, Haile A.
    Kalisetti, Deepika R.
    Gaba, Mahender
    McCormick, Daniel J.
    Goldberg, Sheldon
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 24 (10): : 544 - 550
  • [9] Impella-Assisted Complex High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Lin, Yen-Po
    Lee, Wen-Lieng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (16) : S208 - S210
  • [10] Impella ventricular assist device: A "valvular bypass" to support high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention or complicated transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    Nai Fovino, Luca
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 95 (03) : 363 - 364