Improvement of oral anticoagulation therapy by INR self-management

被引:3
作者
Horstkotte, D [1 ]
Piper, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Heart Ctr N Rhine Westphalia, Dept Cardiol, D-32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Thromboembolic complications after valve replacement are significantly reduced if the INR is increased from 1.0 to 2.0. Hemorrhagic events increase exponentially with more intensive oral anticoagulation. In INR (patient) self-testing (PST), patients self-check their INR after being appropriately educated and supplied with a coagulometer. Patients contact their home physician if the actual INR tends to run outside an individually defined target INR corridor for correction. For patient self-management (PSM), subjects are trained to self-test their INR and to adjust the anticoagulant dose according to their anticoagulation state. The median difference between self-tested and laboratory-tested INRs was <5.0%, indicating no significant differences between the two methods. PSM resulted in a significantly more stable oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT), which was the strongest predictor for a low complication rate after valve replacement surgery. Lower rates of thromboembolism (0.9 versus 3.6% per patient-year; pt-yr) and bleeding (4.5 versus 10.9% per pt-yr) (p<0.001) were seen in PSM subjects than with conventional INR management. A switch from conventional to PSM resulted in a 30% reduction in complication rates in the German Experience with Low Intensity Anticoagulation (GELIA) study. After appropriate education and provision with a handy coagulometer, the vast majority of patients after valve replacement can self-check INRs and adjust the anticoagulant dosage accordingly. PSM results in a significantly more stable oral anticoagulation treatment and consequently in lower incidences of thromboembolic and bleeding events.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 338
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ALTMAN R, 1991, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V101, P427
[2]  
BERNARDO A, 1996, J THROMB THROMBOLYS, V2, P321
[3]   OPTIMAL ORAL ANTICOAGULANT-THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH MECHANICAL HEART-VALVES [J].
CANNEGIETER, SC ;
ROSENDAAL, FR ;
WINTZEN, AR ;
VANDERMEER, FJM ;
VANDENBROUCKE, JP ;
BRIET, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (01) :11-17
[4]  
FORFAR JC, 1979, BRIT HEART J, V42, P128
[5]  
Horstkotte D, 1993, J Heart Valve Dis, V2, P291
[6]  
Horstkotte D., 1996, European Heart Journal, V17, P230
[7]   Problems with complication rate analysis [J].
Horstkotte, D .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 126 (05) :1668-1670
[8]   LOWER INTENSITY ANTICOAGULATION THERAPY RESULTS IN LOWER COMPLICATION RATES WITH THE ST-JUDE MEDICAL PROSTHESIS [J].
HORSTKOTTE, D ;
SCHULTE, HD ;
BIRCKS, W ;
STRAUER, BE .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1994, 107 (04) :1136-1145
[9]  
Horstkotte D, 1993, J Heart Valve Dis, V2, P411
[10]  
HORSTKOTTE D, 1998, J THROMB THROMBOLYS, V5, pS19