Analysis of the scapulohumeral rhythm and electromyography of the shoulder muscles during elevation and lowering: Comparison of dominant and nondominant shoulders

被引:58
作者
Yoshizaki, Kunio [1 ,2 ]
Hamada, Junichiro [3 ]
Tamai, Kazuya [4 ]
Sahara, Ryo [3 ]
Fujiwara, Takayuki [1 ,2 ]
Fujimoto, Tetsuya [2 ]
机构
[1] Koriyama Inst Hlth Sci, Fukushima 9638834, Japan
[2] Shinshu Univ, Interdisciplinary Grad Sch Sci & Technol, Nagano, Japan
[3] Kuwano Kyoritsu Hosp, Fukushima, Japan
[4] Dokkyo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Mibu, Tochigi 32102, Japan
关键词
Shoulder joint; dominance; scapulohumeral rhythm; electromyography; SCAPULAR PLANE; FROZEN SHOULDER; ARM ABDUCTION; KINEMATICS; MOTION; POSITION; RANGE; IMPINGEMENT; HANDEDNESS; MOVEMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.021
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: Assessment of whether elevation and lowering of the dominant and nondominant arms occur in a similar manner in healthy individuals is clinically important in terms of shoulder disorders. Materials and methods: We examined the scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) and performed electromyography (EMG) for the middle deltoid, upper trapezius, lower trapezius, and lower part of the serratus anterior muscles of both shoulders in 18 healthy volunteers (14 men, 4 women) with a mean age of 24 years (range, 19-30 years). The participants randomly elevated and lowered either the right or left arm in the scapular plane, and the motion was measured using a 3-dimensional motion analyzer. Results: The average angles of maximum arm elevation and scapular upward rotation were 130.3 degrees +/- 7.9 degrees and 32.2 degrees +/- 5.6 degrees, respectively, for dominant arms, and 130.8 degrees +/- 6.4 degrees and 31.8 degrees +/- 5.8 degrees, respectively, for nondominant arms. The SHR in each 10 degrees increment did not differ significantly between the dominant and nondominant arms in each participant during elevation (P = .337) and lowering (P =. 1). A significant difference was found in the percentage integrated EMG (%IEMG) of the lower trapezius between the 2 shoulders (P < .049). Discussion: If the kinematic difference is identified between both shoulders, we can predict the dysfunction or disorder in shoulder complex. Moreover, we should evaluate how shoulder muscles are used and whether the muscle becomes weak. Conclusions: Healthy individuals elevate and lower the dominant and nondominant shoulders in a similar kinematical pattern despite 3 of 4 muscles indicating different EMG activities between both shoulders. Level of evidence: Basic science study. (C) 2009 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 763
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters
    Akel, Ibrahim
    Pekmezci, Murat
    Hayran, Mutlu
    Genc, Yasemin
    Kocak, Ozgur
    Derman, Orhan
    Erdogan, Ilkay
    Yazici, Muharrem
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (03) : 348 - 354
  • [2] Handedness: Dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics
    Bagesteiro, LB
    Sainburg, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 88 (05) : 2408 - 2421
  • [3] BAGG SD, 1986, AM J PHYS MED REHAB, V65, P111
  • [4] The effects of age, sex, and shoulder dominance on range of motion of the shoulder
    Barnes, CJ
    Van Steyn, S
    Fischer, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (03) : 242 - 246
  • [5] Qualitative clinical evaluation of scapular dysfunction: a reliability study
    Ben Kibler, W
    Uhl, TL
    Maddux, JWQ
    Brooks, PV
    Zeller, B
    McMullen, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (06) : 550 - 556
  • [6] Cathcart C W, 1884, J Anat Physiol, V18, P211
  • [7] CODMAN EA, 1934, NORMAL MOTIONS SHOUL, P32
  • [8] Scapular kinematics during humeral elevation in adults and children
    Dayanidhi, S
    Orlin, M
    Kozin, S
    Duff, S
    Karduna, A
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 20 (06) : 600 - 606
  • [9] The scapulo-humeral rhythm: effects of 2-D roentgen projection
    de Groot, JH
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 14 (01) : 63 - 68
  • [10] DELAGI EF, 2005, ANATOMY GUIDE ELECTR, P104