Food and Food-Odor Preferences in Dogs: A Pilot Study

被引:25
作者
Hall, Nathaniel J. [1 ]
Peron, Franck [2 ]
Cambou, Stephanie [2 ]
Callejon, Laurence [2 ]
Wynne, Clive D. L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Anim & Food Sci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Diana Pet Food, F-56250 Za De Gohelis, Elven, France
[3] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
canine; odor; olfaction; preference; palatability; PALATABILITY ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL; DOMESTIC DOGS; CANIS-FAMILIARIS; CATS; BEHAVIOR; 2-PAN; SCHEDULES; OLFACTION; BEAGLES; SUGARS;
D O I
10.1093/chemse/bjx016
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evaluation of food palatability and preference is of great importance to the pet food industry. One common technique for evaluating palatability is a 2-bowl test in which 2 products are offered simultaneously and food consumption is measured. This yields clear results with dogs trained to routinely conduct such comparisons, but it is less clear how this extends to untrained pet dogs. In addition, prior research indicates that olfaction is important in food preference, but methods for evaluating odor preference in canines are currently lacking. In this study, we developed a modified 2-bowl test for evaluation of food preferences in pet dogs with minimal training, and an olfactometer technique for the evaluation of odor preferences. In our 2-bowl procedure, we observed clear preferences among 4 commercial food products in 6 pet dogs. Across repeated testing, preferences strengthened, but the first evaluation accurately estimated the direction and significance of preference. In addition, dogs typically (89% of the time) consumed more of the food they chose first, suggesting they did not need to taste each food to choose. Our odor preference olfactometer assessment, however, did not reveal odor preferences other than that dogs preferred to sniff a food odor over clean air. Further work will be needed to identify methods of measuring odor preferences amongst food odors for dogs, but the modified 2-bowl test shows promise for further testing in pet dogs.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 370
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Pet Food Palatability Evaluation: A Review of Standard Assay Techniques and Interpretation of Results with a Primary Focus on Limitations [J].
Aldrich, Gregory C. ;
Koppel, Kadri .
ANIMALS, 2015, 5 (01) :43-55
[2]   Comparison of the cognitive palatability assessment protocol and the two-pan test for use in assessing palatability of two similar foods in dogs\ [J].
Araujo, JA ;
Studzinski, CM ;
Larson, BT ;
Milgram, NW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2004, 65 (11) :1490-1496
[3]  
Araujo JA, 2004, J ANIM SCI, V82, P2200
[4]   RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS .1. THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS [J].
BRADLEY, RA ;
TERRY, ME .
BIOMETRIKA, 1952, 39 (3-4) :324-345
[5]   The evolutionary basis for the feeding behavior of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and cats (Felis catus) [J].
Bradshaw, John W. S. .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2006, 136 (07) :1927S-1931S
[7]   Diet of free-ranging domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) in rural Zimbabwe:: implications for wild scavengers on the periphery of wildlife reserves [J].
Butler, JRA ;
du Toit, JT .
ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2002, 5 :29-37
[8]   HEDONIC SCALING OF SUGARS USING CONCURRENT OPERANT SCHEDULES WITH DOGS [J].
CHAO, ET .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1984, 8 (02) :225-229
[9]   Optimization of key aroma compounds for dog food attractant [J].
Chen, Maoshen ;
Chen, Xuemei ;
Nsor-Atindana, John ;
Masamba, Kingsley George ;
Ma, Jianguo ;
Zhong, Fang .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 225 :173-181
[10]  
David H. A., 1963, The method of paired comparisons, V12