THE DESTRUCTION OF ESCHERICHIA COLI BIOFILMS USING HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND

被引:60
作者
Bigelow, Timothy A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Northagen, Trevor [3 ]
Hill, Thomas M. [4 ]
Sailer, Frances C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Univ N Dakota, Dept Elect Engn, Sch Engn & Mines, Grand Forks, ND 58201 USA
[4] Univ N Dakota, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Grand Forks, ND 58201 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ultrasound therapy; Biofilm; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-EPIDERMIDIS; TISSUE EROSION; INFECTIONS; TECHNOLOGY; MECHANISM; BEHAVIOR; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.12.001
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has shown great potential for replacing surgery in many applications. In this work, HIFU was used to destroy Escherichia coli (E. coli) biofilms that had been grown on chambered microscope slides. Biofilms are central to the pathogenesis and persistence of nosocomial (hospital-acquired) infections associated with indwelling medical devices. The slides were exposed to 9.1 mu s pulses at a pulse repetition frequency of 1000 Hz. The pulses were generated by a 1.1 MHz spherically focused source with a focal length of 6.3 cm and an active diameter of 7 cm. The peak rarefactional pressure for the pulses was varied as 3.1, 4.1, 5.2, 6.2 and 7.6 MPa in addition to a sham where the biofilms were not exposed. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by determining the number of colony forming units (CFU) remaining following exposure of the bacteria to HIFU. Most of the biofilms treated at the higher exposures of 6.2 and 7.6 MPa had no detectable CFU, indicating that bacteria in the biofilm were killed by the treatment or that treatment disrupted the biofilm and released bacteria from the slide. However, the ability of some bacteria to survive at the higher exposure settings needs to be resolved prior to implementing the treatment clinically. (E-mail: bigelow@iastate.edu). (C) 2009 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:1026 / 1031
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Treatment of biofilm infections on implants with low-frequency ultrasound and antibiotics [J].
Carmen, JC ;
Roeder, BL ;
Nelson, JL ;
Ogilvie, RLR ;
Robison, RA ;
Schaalje, GB ;
Pitt, WG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2005, 33 (02) :78-82
[2]   The Calgary Biofilm Device: New technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms [J].
Ceri, H ;
Olson, ME ;
Stremick, C ;
Read, RR ;
Morck, D ;
Buret, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (06) :1771-1776
[3]   Noninvasive, transcranial and localized opening of the blood-brain barrier using focused ultrasound in mice [J].
Choi, James J. ;
Pernot, Mathieu ;
Small, Scott A. ;
Konofagou, Elisa E. .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 33 (01) :95-104
[4]   ANTIBODY-RESPONSE TO PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA SURFACE PROTEIN ANTIGENS IN A RAT MODEL OF CHRONIC LUNG INFECTION [J].
COCHRANE, DMG ;
BROWN, MRW ;
ANWAR, H ;
WELLER, PH ;
LAM, K ;
COSTERTON, JW .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1988, 27 (04) :255-261
[5]   Device-associated infections: A macroproblem that starts with microadherence [J].
Darouiche, RO .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 33 (09) :1567-1572
[6]  
deBeer D, 1997, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V53, P151, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970120)53:2<151::AID-BIT4>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-N
[8]   Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation bubble density and cell concentration:: A unified explanation based on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius [J].
Guzmán, HR ;
McNamara, AJ ;
Nguyen, DX ;
Prausnitz, MR .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 29 (08) :1211-1222
[9]  
Hall TL, 2005, ULTRASON, P1732
[10]   Transfection effect of microbubbles on cells in superposed ultrasound waves and behavior of cavitation bubble [J].
Kodama, Tetsuya ;
Tomita, Yukio ;
Koshiyama, Ken-ichiro ;
Blomley, Martin J. K. .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 32 (06) :905-914