Forage types and origin of manure in codigestion affect methane yield and microbial community structure

被引:10
作者
Ahlberg-Eliasson, K. [1 ,2 ]
Liu, T. [2 ]
Nadeau, E. [1 ,3 ]
Schnurer, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Rural Econ & Agr Soc, Langhem, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Mol Sci, Bioctr, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Environm & Hlth, Skara, Sweden
关键词
biogas; digestate; greenhouse gas emissions; microbiology; silage; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION PROCESS; SYNERGISTIC CO-DIGESTION; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SOLID-ORGANIC-WASTE; PLUS; EQUALS; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; CATTLE MANURE; ENERGY CROPS; DAIRY MANURE;
D O I
10.1111/gfs.12358
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In farm-scale biogas systems, different kinds of manure are the most important substrate for anaerobic digestion, but result in low biogas yields. Biogas production can be increased by complementing the manure with forage crops, in codigestion. The aim of this study was to evaluate grass-clover (GCS) and whole-crop barley silages (WCB) in codigestion with manure from organic and conventional dairy production systems on biogas production, microbial community, degree of degradation and gas quality at different organic loading rates by addition of soya bean meal and wheat grain, which are rich in protein and starch. Four continuous stirred anaerobic laboratory-scale reactors were used, and the codigestion resulted in additive effects on biogas production, but no synergistic effects. The highest biogas yield was obtained in reactors receiving WCB independently of manure types, for both experiments (7,416ml/day and 10,978ml/day respectively). The degradation efficiency, measured as the reduction in volatile solids was, on average, six percentage units higher in the reactors receiving manure from conventional compared with organic dairy cows, probably because of a higher concentration of undigested fibre and proteins in conventional cow manure. Microbiological analysis by illumina sequencing illustrated low impact of both manure types on the reactor community and only small differences between the reactors receiving GCS and WCB. However, addition of soya bean meal and wheat grain changed the community in all reactors. The ratio between Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes was comparably higher in reactors having the highest gas production and methane yield.
引用
收藏
页码:740 / 757
页数:18
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Production efficiency of Swedish farm-scale biogas plants
    Ahlberg-Eliasson, Karin
    Nadeau, Elisabet
    Leven, Lotta
    Schnurer, Anna
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2017, 97 : 27 - 37
  • [2] Synergistic co-digestion of solid-organic-waste and municipal-sewage-sludge: 1 plus 1 equals more than 2 in terms of biogas production and solids reduction
    Aichinger, Peter
    Wadhawan, Tanush
    Kuprian, Martin
    Higgins, Matthew
    Ebner, Christian
    Fimml, Christian
    Murthy, Sudhir
    Wett, Bernhard
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2015, 87 : 416 - 423
  • [3] Åkerlind M, 2011, EAAP PUBLIC, P41
  • [4] AMAN P, 1984, SWED J AGR RES, V14, P135
  • [5] Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure - Influence of biomass composition on the methane yield
    Amon, Thomas
    Amon, Barbara
    Kryvoruchko, Vitaliy
    Zollitsch, Werner
    Mayer, Karl
    Gruber, Leonhard
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) : 173 - 182
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1994, NUTR ECOLOGY RUMINAN
  • [7] Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agroindustrial residues
    Antonio Alburquerque, Jose
    de la Fuente, Carlos
    Ferrer-Costa, Alicia
    Carrasco, Lucia
    Cegarra, Juan
    Abad, Manuel
    Pilar Bernal, Maria
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 40 : 181 - 189
  • [8] Methane Production and Kinetic Modeling for Co-digestion of Manure with Lignocellulosic Residues
    Awais, Muhammad
    Alvarado-Morales, Merlin
    Tsapekos, Panagiotis
    Gulfraz, Muhammad
    Angelidaki, Irini
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (12) : 10516 - 10523
  • [9] Presence and Role of Anaerobic Hydrolytic Microbes in Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Biogas Production
    Azman, Samet
    Khadem, Ahmad F.
    Van Lier, Jules B.
    Zeeman, Grietje
    Plugge, Caroline M.
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 45 (23) : 2523 - 2564
  • [10] Balsberg-Pahlsson A.M., 1990, FORBEHANDLING UPPSLU, P18