Urban energy use modeling methods and tools: A review and an outlook

被引:110
作者
Abbasabadi, Narjes [1 ]
Ashayeri, J. K. Mehdi [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT, Coll Architecture, 3360 S State St, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
关键词
Urban energy use modeling; Operational energy; Transport energy; Embodied energy; Data-driven; Simulation; EXTREME LEARNING-MACHINE; DATA-DRIVEN; EMBODIED ENERGY; NEURAL-NETWORKS; CONSUMPTION; SIMULATION; BUILDINGS; CITY; SYSTEM; OCCUPANCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106270
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Urban energy use modeling is important for understanding and managing energy performance in cities. However, the existing methods and tools have limitations in representing a realistic urban energy model and supporting energy performance evaluation at urban or neighborhood scales. In addition, there is a lack of an integrated approach for modeling and analyzing different components of urban energy use. The existing methods and tools for assessment of urban energy use often reduce the urban energy use definition to operational energy of buildings, ignoring other essential components such as transportation energy, and embodied energy of buildings and infrastructure. In addition, reliable and accurate urban energy prediction remains a challenge as methodological uncertainties that are embedded in the common methods are often not considered. This, in turn, affects the suitability of these approaches for decision-making purposes. The key limitation of data-driven methods stem from the use of aggregate data for energy use estimations and generalizing the status quo. In simulation-based methods, oversimplification of the urban context and failure to account for occupancy and human-related factors, and urban microclimate and inter-building effects are the major limitations. The present article provides a review of the current modeling methods, tools, and techniques in urban energy use modeling. It examines the strengths and limitations of each and presents an outlook for a future urban energy use modeling (UEUM) approach that could capture different components of urban energy use through a bottom-up hybrid data-driven and simulation-based techniques to build upon the strengths of the two methods while reducing the modeling uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 139 条
  • [81] Energy system analysis of 100% renewable energy systems-The case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050
    Lund, H.
    Mathiesen, B. V.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2009, 34 (05) : 524 - 531
  • [82] Modeling of district load forecasting for distributed energy system
    Ma, Weiwu
    Fang, Song
    Liu, Gang
    Zhou, Ruoyu
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 204 : 181 - 205
  • [83] Macqueen J., SOME METHODS CLASSIF, V17
  • [84] Applications of machine learning methods to identifying and predicting building retrofit opportunities
    Marasco, Daniel E.
    Kontokosta, Constantine E.
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 128 : 431 - 441
  • [85] Comparison between simplified and detailed EnergyPlus models coupled with an urban canopy model
    Martin, Miguel
    Nyuk Hien Wong
    Hii, Daniel Jun Chung
    Ignatius, Marcel
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 157 : 116 - 125
  • [86] Martinez F., 1996, MUSSA BEHAV LAND US
  • [87] Mastrucci A., 2015, GIS BASED APPROACH E
  • [88] Matzarakis A, 2010, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V54, P131, DOI [10.1007/s00484-006-0061-8, 10.1007/s00484-009-0261-0]
  • [89] Microsimulating urban systems
    Miller, Eric J.
    Hunt, John Douglas
    Abraham, John E.
    Salvini, Paul A.
    [J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2004, 28 (1-2) : 9 - 44
  • [90] Dynamic simulation methodologies for urban energy demand
    Monsalvete, Pilar
    Robinson, Darren
    Eicker, Ursula
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING PHYSICS CONFERENCE (IBPC 2015), 2015, 78 : 3360 - 3365