Painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis:: CT imaging

被引:78
作者
Cyteval, C
Hamm, V
Sarrabère, MP
Lopez, FM
Maury, P
Taourel, P
机构
[1] Hop Lapeyronie, Dept Radiol, F-34295 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Hop Lapeyronie, Dept Orthopaed, F-34295 Montpellier, France
[3] Hop Caremeau, Dept Radiol, Nimes, France
关键词
hip; CT; infection; prostheses;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2242010989
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) in the detection of painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis before surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Helical CT examinations of hip prostheses were prospectively performed before surgery after a standard clinical and radiologic examination of 65 patients. CT scans and conventional radiographs were reviewed for periprosthetic bone abnormalities, and CT scans were reviewed for periprosthetic soft-tissue abnormalities (joint distention, fluid-filled bursae, and fluid collection in muscles and perimuscular fat). Patients subsequently underwent revision arthroplasty within I month, and infection was diagnosed in 12 (19%) patients. RESULTS: Infection was detected clinically in 25% of patients. Periprosthetic bone abnormalities did not allow differentiation of infection from complications not related to sepsis, except for periostitis, with 100% specificity but only 16% sensitivity, Soft-tissue findings were accurate for detection of infection, with 100% sensitivity and 87% specificity. Fluid collection in muscles and perimuscular fat had a 100% positive predictive value, and absence of joint distention had a 96% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: CT is accurate in the diagnosis of painful infection at the site of a hip prosthesis on the basis of soft-tissue findings, whereas periprosthetic bone abnormalities are not useful. (C) RSNA, 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 483
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] CEMENTED TOTAL HIP-PROSTHESIS - RADIOGRAPHIC AND SCINTIGRAPHIC EVALUATION
    ALIABADI, P
    TUMEH, SS
    WEISSMAN, BN
    MCNEIL, BJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 173 (01) : 203 - 206
  • [2] COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING OF COMPLICATED TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT
    BARMEIR, E
    DUBOWITZ, B
    ROFFMAN, M
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 53 (04): : 597 - 604
  • [3] THE VALUE OF ASPIRATION OF THE HIP-JOINT BEFORE REVISION TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
    BARRACK, RL
    HARRIS, WH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (01) : 66 - 76
  • [4] BEAUCHAMP NJ, 1995, SKELETAL RADIOL, V24, P317
  • [5] PSEUDOBURSAE - A USEFUL FINDING IN PATIENTS WITH PAINFUL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
    BERQUIST, TH
    BENDER, CE
    MAUS, TP
    WARD, EM
    RAND, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 148 (01) : 103 - 106
  • [6] BYWATERS EG, 1965, ANN RHEUM DIS, V24, P215
  • [7] The role of aspiration and contrast-enhanced arthrography in evaluating the uncemented hip arthroplasty
    Cheung, A
    Lachiewicz, PF
    Renner, JB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (05) : 1305 - 1309
  • [8] EVANS BG, 1992, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V23, P303
  • [9] METALLIC HIP IMPLANTS - CT WITH MULTIPLANAR RECONSTRUCTION
    FISHMAN, EK
    MAGID, D
    ROBERTSON, DD
    BROOKER, AF
    WEISS, P
    SIEGELMAN, SS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1986, 160 (03) : 675 - 681
  • [10] GRIFFITHS HJ, 1995, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V33, P267