Painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis:: CT imaging

被引:79
作者
Cyteval, C
Hamm, V
Sarrabère, MP
Lopez, FM
Maury, P
Taourel, P
机构
[1] Hop Lapeyronie, Dept Radiol, F-34295 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Hop Lapeyronie, Dept Orthopaed, F-34295 Montpellier, France
[3] Hop Caremeau, Dept Radiol, Nimes, France
关键词
hip; CT; infection; prostheses;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2242010989
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) in the detection of painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis before surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Helical CT examinations of hip prostheses were prospectively performed before surgery after a standard clinical and radiologic examination of 65 patients. CT scans and conventional radiographs were reviewed for periprosthetic bone abnormalities, and CT scans were reviewed for periprosthetic soft-tissue abnormalities (joint distention, fluid-filled bursae, and fluid collection in muscles and perimuscular fat). Patients subsequently underwent revision arthroplasty within I month, and infection was diagnosed in 12 (19%) patients. RESULTS: Infection was detected clinically in 25% of patients. Periprosthetic bone abnormalities did not allow differentiation of infection from complications not related to sepsis, except for periostitis, with 100% specificity but only 16% sensitivity, Soft-tissue findings were accurate for detection of infection, with 100% sensitivity and 87% specificity. Fluid collection in muscles and perimuscular fat had a 100% positive predictive value, and absence of joint distention had a 96% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: CT is accurate in the diagnosis of painful infection at the site of a hip prosthesis on the basis of soft-tissue findings, whereas periprosthetic bone abnormalities are not useful. (C) RSNA, 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 483
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   CEMENTED TOTAL HIP-PROSTHESIS - RADIOGRAPHIC AND SCINTIGRAPHIC EVALUATION [J].
ALIABADI, P ;
TUMEH, SS ;
WEISSMAN, BN ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 173 (01) :203-206
[2]   COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING OF COMPLICATED TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT [J].
BARMEIR, E ;
DUBOWITZ, B ;
ROFFMAN, M .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 53 (04) :597-604
[3]   THE VALUE OF ASPIRATION OF THE HIP-JOINT BEFORE REVISION TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY [J].
BARRACK, RL ;
HARRIS, WH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (01) :66-76
[4]  
BEAUCHAMP NJ, 1995, SKELETAL RADIOL, V24, P317
[5]   PSEUDOBURSAE - A USEFUL FINDING IN PATIENTS WITH PAINFUL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY [J].
BERQUIST, TH ;
BENDER, CE ;
MAUS, TP ;
WARD, EM ;
RAND, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 148 (01) :103-106
[6]  
BYWATERS EG, 1965, ANN RHEUM DIS, V24, P215
[7]   The role of aspiration and contrast-enhanced arthrography in evaluating the uncemented hip arthroplasty [J].
Cheung, A ;
Lachiewicz, PF ;
Renner, JB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (05) :1305-1309
[8]  
EVANS BG, 1992, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V23, P303
[9]   METALLIC HIP IMPLANTS - CT WITH MULTIPLANAR RECONSTRUCTION [J].
FISHMAN, EK ;
MAGID, D ;
ROBERTSON, DD ;
BROOKER, AF ;
WEISS, P ;
SIEGELMAN, SS .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 160 (03) :675-681
[10]  
GRIFFITHS HJ, 1995, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V33, P267