Deriving a mapping algorithm for converting SF-36 scores to EQ-5D utility score in a Korean population

被引:14
作者
Kim, Seon-Ha [1 ]
Kim, Seon-Ok [2 ]
Lee, Sang-il [3 ]
Jo, Min-Woo [3 ]
机构
[1] Dankook Univ, Dept Nursing, Cheonan 330714, South Korea
[2] Asan Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
EQ-5D; SF-36; Quality of life; Utility; Korea; HEALTH STATE UTILITIES; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; GENERAL-POPULATION; INDEX; SF-12; MULTIATTRIBUTE; RESPONSES; VERSION; VALUES;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-014-0145-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is no research on mapping algorithms between EQ-5D and SF-36 in Korea. The aim of this study was to derive a predictive model for converting the SF-36 health profile to the EQ-5D index using data from several studies. Methods: Individual data (n = 2211) were collected from three different studies and separated into derivation (n = 1660) and internal validation sets (n = 551). Data from 123 colon cancer patients were analyzed for external validation. The prediction models were analyzed using ordinary least-square (OLS) regression, two-part modeling, and multinomial logistic modeling using eight scale scores; two summary scores and the interaction terms of SF-36 were used as independent variables. The EQ-5D index using the Korean value set and each dimension of the EQ-5D were used as dependent variables. The mean absolute errors (MAE) and R-2 values of the internal and external validation dataset were used to evaluate model performance. Results: Our findings show that the three different scoring algorithms demonstrate similar performances in terms of MAE and R-2. After considering familiarity and parsimony, the OLS model (including Physical Function, Bodily Pain, Social Function, Role Emotional, and Mental Health) was found to be optimal as the final algorithm for use in this study. The MAEs of the OLS models demonstrated consistent results in both the derivation (0.087-0.109) and external validation sets (0.082-0.097). Conclusion: This study provides mapping algorithms for estimating the EQ-5D index from the SF-36 profile using individual data and confirms that these algorithms demonstrate high explanatory power and low prediction errors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 10 NICE DSU
[2]   Deriving an Algorithm to Convert the Eight Mean SF-36 Dimension Scores into a Mean EQ-5D Preference-Based Score from Published Studies (Where Patient Level Data Are Not Available) [J].
Ara, Roberta ;
Brazier, John .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (07) :1131-1143
[3]   The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 [J].
Brazier, J ;
Roberts, J ;
Deverill, M .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) :271-292
[4]   A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures [J].
Brazier, John E. ;
Yang, Yaling ;
Tsuchiya, Aki ;
Rowen, Donna Louise .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2010, 11 (02) :215-225
[5]   Estimating a preference-based index from the Japanese SF-36 [J].
Brazier, John E. ;
Fukuhara, Shunichi ;
Roberts, Jennifer ;
Kharroubi, Samer ;
Yamamoto, Yosuke ;
Ikeda, Shunya ;
Doherty, Jim ;
Kurokawa, Kiyoshi .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (12) :1323-1331
[6]   Underestimation of Uncertainties in Health Utilities Derived from Mapping Algorithms Involving Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measures: Statistical Explanations and Potential Remedies [J].
Chan, Kelvin K. W. ;
Willan, Andrew R. ;
Gupta, Michael ;
Pullenayegum, Eleanor .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (07) :863-872
[7]   Converting the SF-12 into the EQ-5D An Empirical Comparison of Methodologies [J].
Chuang, Ling-Hsiang ;
Kind, Paul .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2009, 27 (06) :491-505
[8]   Valuing health states: A comparison of methods [J].
Dolan, P ;
Gudex, C ;
Kind, P ;
Williams, A .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1996, 15 (02) :209-231
[9]  
Dow W., 2003, Health Services Outcome Research Methodology, V4, P5, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1025827426320
[10]  
Drummond MF, 2005, Methods for The Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes