Antimicrobial usage, animal welfare and biosecurity in 16 dairy farms in Lombardy

被引:0
作者
Ginestreti, Jessica [1 ]
Lorenzi, Valentina [1 ]
Fusi, Francesca [1 ]
Ferrara, Giandomenico [1 ]
Scali, Federico [2 ]
Alborali, Giovanni Loris [2 ]
Bolzoni, Luca [3 ]
Bertocchi, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, Ctr Referenza Nazl Benessere Anim, Parma, Italy
[2] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, Lab Diagnost, Parma, Italy
[3] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, Risk Anal & Genom Epidemiol Unit, Parma, Italy
来源
LARGE ANIMAL REVIEW | 2020年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Dairy cow welfare; welfare assessment; antimicrobial usage; defined daily dose; COWS; QUANTIFICATION; HEALTH; COUNT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The present study reports the preliminary results obtained from the on-field application of the new Italian integrated system "ClassyFarm" for the risk-based categorization of dairy farms in relation to animal welfare, biosecurity and antimicrobial usage and it investigates the relationships between these 3 aspects of the farming system. Over the three year-period 2016-2018, sixteen Italian loose housing dairy farms were assessed using this integrated approach. Animal welfare and biosecurity levels were determined applying the checklist developed by the Italian Reference Centre for Animal Welfare (CReNBA) and included in the ClassyFarm system. The antimicrobial usage (AMU), defined as the number of days in which an animal is potentially exposed to an antimicrobial treatment during a year, was calculated using the Defined Daily Dose Animal for Italy (DDDAit), based on the Italian summaries of product characteristics. In the sixteen investigated farms, the average animal welfare level was 67.98% (range 45.32%-81.69%), the average biosecurity level was 45.86% (range 21.41% - 71.56%) and the average AMU was 10.57 days/cow per year. Antimicrobials in cows were mostly used for udder problems (42.03%), dry cow therapies (35.77%), locomotion problems (12.74%), urogenital diseases (5.79%) and respiratory diseases (2.36%). Penicillins, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins were the most used classes of antimicrobials. The most common routes of administration were the injectable route (43.57%) and the intramammary route (34.67% in dry cows and 20.34% in lactating cows, respectively). No statistically significant correlations (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient) were identified between AMU and the other variables (animal welfare level and biosecurity level), however, further investigations on a larger sample of farms are needed to confirm the obtained results. The integrated system "ClassyFarm" turned out to be a very promising tool for Italian dairy farms, in order to monitor and enhance animal welfare and biosecurity levels and to support a more rational antimicrobial usage, satisfying National and European demands for the reduction of the antimicrobial usage.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Human-Animal Interactions in Dairy Buffalo Farms [J].
Napolitano, Fabio ;
Serrapica, Francesco ;
Braghieri, Ada ;
Masucci, Felicia ;
Sabia, Emilio ;
De Rosa, Giuseppe .
ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (05)
[42]   Dairy cattle welfare assessment in 25 farms in southern Brazil [J].
Bond, G. B. ;
Ostrensky, A. ;
Almeida, R. ;
Molento, C. F. M. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 :17-17
[43]   First Case Report on Quantification of Antimicrobial Use in Corporate Dairy Farms in Pakistan [J].
Umair, Muhammad ;
Abdullah, Rana Muhammad ;
Aslam, Bilal ;
Nawaz, Muhammad Hassan ;
Ali, Qasim ;
Fatima, Fariha ;
Ali, Jabir ;
Zahoor, Muhammad Asif ;
Mohsin, Mashkoor .
FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7
[44]   Applying animal-based welfare assessments on New Zealand dairy farms: feasibility and a comparison with United Kingdom data [J].
Laven, R. A. ;
Fabian, J. .
NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 64 (04) :212-217
[45]   An Investigation of Dairy Cattle Welfare in Commercial Iranian Farms: Results from Animal- and Stockperson-Based Measures [J].
Jafari-Gh, Ali ;
Laven, Richard ;
Khaloubagheri, Fatima ;
Mirrahimi, Mohsen Haji ;
Jafari-Gh, Saeid ;
Banadaky, Mehdi Dehghan ;
Mueller, Kristina Ruth ;
Vallee, Emilie .
ANIMALS, 2025, 15 (03)
[46]   Impact of Automation Level of Dairy Farms in Northern and Central Germany on Dairy Cattle Welfare [J].
Lavrijsen-Kromwijk, Lianne ;
Demba, Susanne ;
Mueller, Ute ;
Rose, Sandra .
ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (24)
[47]   Animal farming and animal welfare - a discussion by example of dairy cattle husbandry [J].
Brade, Wilfried .
PRAKTISCHE TIERARZT, 2012, 93 (01) :50-+
[48]   Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Manure Blend Pits and Long-Term Storage Across Dairy Farms with Comparisons to Antimicrobial Usage and Residual Concentrations [J].
Hurst, Jerod J. ;
Oliver, Jason P. ;
Schueler, Jenna ;
Gooch, Curt ;
Lansing, Stephanie ;
Crossette, Emily ;
Wigginton, Krista ;
Raskin, Lutgarde ;
Aga, Diana S. ;
Sassoubre, Lauren M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 53 (05) :2405-2415
[49]   Somatic cell count and an Animal Needs Index to evaluate animal welfare in dairy cattle on farms constructed to the standards of the Agriculture and Rural Development Support Institution [J].
Keskin, Hasan ;
Garip, Mustafa .
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 53 (04) :476-484
[50]   Influence of husbandry conditions on animal welfare at cattle farms in Turkey [J].
Koseman, Abdurrahman ;
Seker, Ibrahim .
ANIMAL SCIENCE PAPERS AND REPORTS, 2019, 37 (02) :137-147