Antimicrobial usage, animal welfare and biosecurity in 16 dairy farms in Lombardy

被引:0
作者
Ginestreti, Jessica [1 ]
Lorenzi, Valentina [1 ]
Fusi, Francesca [1 ]
Ferrara, Giandomenico [1 ]
Scali, Federico [2 ]
Alborali, Giovanni Loris [2 ]
Bolzoni, Luca [3 ]
Bertocchi, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, Ctr Referenza Nazl Benessere Anim, Parma, Italy
[2] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, Lab Diagnost, Parma, Italy
[3] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, Risk Anal & Genom Epidemiol Unit, Parma, Italy
来源
LARGE ANIMAL REVIEW | 2020年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Dairy cow welfare; welfare assessment; antimicrobial usage; defined daily dose; COWS; QUANTIFICATION; HEALTH; COUNT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The present study reports the preliminary results obtained from the on-field application of the new Italian integrated system "ClassyFarm" for the risk-based categorization of dairy farms in relation to animal welfare, biosecurity and antimicrobial usage and it investigates the relationships between these 3 aspects of the farming system. Over the three year-period 2016-2018, sixteen Italian loose housing dairy farms were assessed using this integrated approach. Animal welfare and biosecurity levels were determined applying the checklist developed by the Italian Reference Centre for Animal Welfare (CReNBA) and included in the ClassyFarm system. The antimicrobial usage (AMU), defined as the number of days in which an animal is potentially exposed to an antimicrobial treatment during a year, was calculated using the Defined Daily Dose Animal for Italy (DDDAit), based on the Italian summaries of product characteristics. In the sixteen investigated farms, the average animal welfare level was 67.98% (range 45.32%-81.69%), the average biosecurity level was 45.86% (range 21.41% - 71.56%) and the average AMU was 10.57 days/cow per year. Antimicrobials in cows were mostly used for udder problems (42.03%), dry cow therapies (35.77%), locomotion problems (12.74%), urogenital diseases (5.79%) and respiratory diseases (2.36%). Penicillins, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins were the most used classes of antimicrobials. The most common routes of administration were the injectable route (43.57%) and the intramammary route (34.67% in dry cows and 20.34% in lactating cows, respectively). No statistically significant correlations (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient) were identified between AMU and the other variables (animal welfare level and biosecurity level), however, further investigations on a larger sample of farms are needed to confirm the obtained results. The integrated system "ClassyFarm" turned out to be a very promising tool for Italian dairy farms, in order to monitor and enhance animal welfare and biosecurity levels and to support a more rational antimicrobial usage, satisfying National and European demands for the reduction of the antimicrobial usage.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Animal welfare and farm economy-exploring the relationship between dairy animal welfare indicators and economic efficiency [J].
Hansen, Bjorn Gunnar .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2023, 221
[32]   Effect of a dairy farmworker stewardship training program on antimicrobial drug usage in dairy cows [J].
Portillo-Gonzalez, R. ;
Garzon, A. ;
Pereira, R. V. V. ;
Silva-del-Rio, N. ;
Karle, B. M. ;
Habing, G. G. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2024, 107 (05) :2941-2953
[33]   Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cows in Small Farms in Bangladesh [J].
Islam, M. Ariful ;
Sharma, Arvind ;
Ahsan, S. ;
Mazumdar, S. ;
Rudra, K. C. ;
Phillips, Clive J. C. .
ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (03)
[34]   Relationship between quality of facilities, animal-based welfare indicators and measures of reproductive and productive performances on dairy farms in the northwest of Spain [J].
Verdes, Sonia ;
Trillo, Yolanda ;
Pena, Ana, I ;
Herradon, Pedro G. ;
Becerra, Juan J. ;
Quintela, Luis A. .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 19 (01) :319-329
[35]   Exploring uses for an algorithmically generated Animal Welfare Indicator for welfare assessment of dairy herds [J].
Barry, Conor ;
Ellingsen-Dalskau, Kristian ;
Winckler, Christoph ;
Kielland, Camilla .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2024, 107 (06) :3941-3958
[36]   Antimicrobial usage and risk of retreatment for mild to moderate clinical mastitis cases on dairy farms following on-farm bacterial culture and selective therapy [J].
McDougall, S. ;
Niethammer, J. ;
Graham, E. M. .
NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2018, 66 (02) :98-107
[37]   Monitoring animal welfare on commercial broiler farms in Sweden [J].
Algers, B ;
Berg, C .
ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 51 :88-92
[38]   Animal welfare assessment in sheep farms befor the application of the Measure 215 "Animal welfare payments" in Tuscany [J].
Gastaldo, A. ;
Benvenuti, M. N. ;
Paganelli, O. ;
Rossi, P. ;
Giuliotti, L. .
LARGE ANIMAL REVIEW, 2015, 21 (03) :137-141
[39]   Quantitative analysis of antimicrobial use on British dairy farms [J].
Hyde, Robert M. ;
Remnant, John G. ;
Bradley, Andrew J. ;
Breen, James E. ;
Hudson, Christopher D. ;
Davies, Peers L. ;
Clarke, Tom ;
Critchell, Yvonne ;
Hylands, Matthew ;
Linton, Emily ;
Wood, Erika ;
Green, Martin J. .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2017, 181 (25)
[40]   Influences on the assessment of resource- and animal-based welfare indicators in unweaned dairy calves for usage by farmers [J].
Hayer, Jason J. ;
Nysar, Dorit ;
Heinemann, Celine ;
Leubner, Caroline D. ;
Steinhoff-Wagner, Julia .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 (10)