Antimicrobial usage, animal welfare and biosecurity in 16 dairy farms in Lombardy

被引:0
作者
Ginestreti, Jessica [1 ]
Lorenzi, Valentina [1 ]
Fusi, Francesca [1 ]
Ferrara, Giandomenico [1 ]
Scali, Federico [2 ]
Alborali, Giovanni Loris [2 ]
Bolzoni, Luca [3 ]
Bertocchi, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, Ctr Referenza Nazl Benessere Anim, Parma, Italy
[2] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, Lab Diagnost, Parma, Italy
[3] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, Risk Anal & Genom Epidemiol Unit, Parma, Italy
来源
LARGE ANIMAL REVIEW | 2020年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Dairy cow welfare; welfare assessment; antimicrobial usage; defined daily dose; COWS; QUANTIFICATION; HEALTH; COUNT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The present study reports the preliminary results obtained from the on-field application of the new Italian integrated system "ClassyFarm" for the risk-based categorization of dairy farms in relation to animal welfare, biosecurity and antimicrobial usage and it investigates the relationships between these 3 aspects of the farming system. Over the three year-period 2016-2018, sixteen Italian loose housing dairy farms were assessed using this integrated approach. Animal welfare and biosecurity levels were determined applying the checklist developed by the Italian Reference Centre for Animal Welfare (CReNBA) and included in the ClassyFarm system. The antimicrobial usage (AMU), defined as the number of days in which an animal is potentially exposed to an antimicrobial treatment during a year, was calculated using the Defined Daily Dose Animal for Italy (DDDAit), based on the Italian summaries of product characteristics. In the sixteen investigated farms, the average animal welfare level was 67.98% (range 45.32%-81.69%), the average biosecurity level was 45.86% (range 21.41% - 71.56%) and the average AMU was 10.57 days/cow per year. Antimicrobials in cows were mostly used for udder problems (42.03%), dry cow therapies (35.77%), locomotion problems (12.74%), urogenital diseases (5.79%) and respiratory diseases (2.36%). Penicillins, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins were the most used classes of antimicrobials. The most common routes of administration were the injectable route (43.57%) and the intramammary route (34.67% in dry cows and 20.34% in lactating cows, respectively). No statistically significant correlations (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient) were identified between AMU and the other variables (animal welfare level and biosecurity level), however, further investigations on a larger sample of farms are needed to confirm the obtained results. The integrated system "ClassyFarm" turned out to be a very promising tool for Italian dairy farms, in order to monitor and enhance animal welfare and biosecurity levels and to support a more rational antimicrobial usage, satisfying National and European demands for the reduction of the antimicrobial usage.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Identifying knowledge gaps surrounding antimicrobial resistance: An exploratory study of antimicrobial resistant genes on Pennsylvania dairy farms
    Ransom, Elizabeth
    Bierly, Stephanie
    Ganda, Erika
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2024, 111
  • [22] Management factors associated with veterinary usage by organic and conventional dairy farms
    Richert, Roxann M.
    Cicconi, Kellie M.
    Gamroth, Mike J.
    Schukken, Ynte H.
    Stiglbauer, Katie E.
    Ruegg, Pamela L.
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 242 (12): : 1732 - 1743
  • [23] A New, Practical Animal Welfare Assessment for Dairy Farmers
    van Eerdenburg, Frank J. C. M.
    Di Giacinto, Alice M.
    Hulsen, Jan
    Snel, Bert
    Stegeman, J. Arjan
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (03): : 1 - 21
  • [24] Antimicrobial Resistance of Staphylococci at Animal Human Interface in Smallholders and Dairy Farms in Central Oromia, Ethiopia
    Marami, Lencho Megersa
    Berhanu, Gemechu
    Tekle, Muluken
    Agga, Getahun Ejeta
    Beyene, Tariku Jibat
    Tufa, Takele Beyene
    Beyi, Ashenafi Feyisa
    Edao, Bedaso Mammo
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2022, 15 : 3767 - 3777
  • [25] Animal welfare measured at mink farms in Europe
    Henriksen, Britt I. F.
    Moller, Steen H.
    Malmkvist, Jens
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2022, 248
  • [26] Relationship between herd size and measures of animal welfare on dairy cattle farms with freestall housing in Germany
    Gieseke, Daniel
    Lambertz, Christian
    Gauly, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (08) : 7397 - 7411
  • [27] How Do Animal Welfare Practices Relate to Farm Characteristics? Evidence from German Dairy Farms
    Wimmer, Stefan
    Frick, Fabian
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2022, 47 (02) : 427 - +
  • [28] Animal welfare outcomes and associated risk indicators on Austrian dairy farms: A cross-sectional study
    Schenkenfelder, J.
    Winckler, C.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (10) : 11091 - 11107
  • [29] Agreement of Benchmarking High Antimicrobial Usage Farms Based on Either Animal Treatment Index or Number of National Defined Daily Doses
    Kuemmerlen, Dolf
    Echtermann, Thomas
    Muentener, Cedric
    Sidler, Xaver
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [30] Animal Welfare and Parasite Infections in Organic and Conventional Dairy Farms: A Comparative Pilot Study in Central Italy
    Chincarini, Matteo
    Lanzoni, Lydia
    Di Pasquale, Jorgelina
    Morelli, Simone
    Vignola, Giorgio
    Paoletti, Barbara
    Di Cesare, Angela
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (03):