On the construct validity of measures of willingness to pay for green electricity: Evidence from a South African case

被引:14
作者
Chan, Kai-Ying [1 ]
Oerlemans, Leon A. G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Volschenk, Jako [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Dept Engn & Technol Management, Grad Sch Technol Management, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Tilburg Univ, Dept Org Studies, NL-5037 AB Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Ctr Innovat Res, NL-5037 AB Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] Univ Stellenbosch, Sch Business, ZA-7530 Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
Green electricity; Willingness to pay; Construct validity; South Africa; CONTINGENT VALUATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CONVERGENT; ATTITUDE; DETERMINANTS; HOUSEHOLDS; CUSTOMERS; PROVISION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.068
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The price consumers are willing to pay (WTP) extra for green electricity (GE) is one of the uncertainties possibly impacting on the overall feasibility of its market introduction. In the literature, several measurements of WTP are used. However, the number of studies comparing WTP measures is limited. This study investigates the construct validity (convergent and theoretical) of two widely used WTP measures (double-bounded dichotomous choice (DC) and open-ended (OE)). A model informed by the well-known theory of planned behaviour was applied to survey data from 890 South African domestic energy users. It was found that convergent validity among the WTP measures was fairly low. Moreover, results from Tobit regressions showed that a grounded theoretical model yields statistically significant results. However, different independent variables emerge in the DC and OE models. Therefore, the theoretical validity of one of the WTP measures seems to be low. The paper proposes a number of explanations for the low construct validity observed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 328
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Willingness to pay for renewable energy: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey in Kenya [J].
Abdullah, Sabah ;
Jeanty, P. Wilner .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (06) :2974-2983
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]   The early adoption of green power by Dutch households - An empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes [J].
Arkesteijn, K ;
Oerlemans, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (02) :183-196
[4]  
Bang HK, 2000, PSYCHOL MARKET, V17, P449, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200006)17:6<449::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-8
[6]   Italian households' willingness to pay for green electricity [J].
Bigerna, Simona ;
Polinori, Paolo .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 34 :110-121
[7]   THE CONCEPT OF EXTERNAL VALIDITY [J].
CALDER, BJ ;
PHILLIPS, LW ;
TYBOUT, AM .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1982, 9 (03) :240-244
[8]   CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[9]   Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence [J].
Carson, RT ;
Flores, NE ;
Meade, NF .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (02) :173-210
[10]   Cognitive complexity implications for research on sustainable competitive advantage [J].
Cheng, Shu-Ling ;
Chang, Hae-Ching .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2010, 63 (01) :67-70