A comparison between residual renal function and peritoneal clearance for Na/H2O and urea removal in peritoneal dialysis patients

被引:1
作者
Shan, Yisheng [1 ]
Xu, Feifei [1 ]
Sun, Mei [1 ]
Ji, Jun [2 ]
Ding, Xiaoqiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Nephrol, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Dept Nephrol, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Residual renal function; peritoneal clearance; Na/H2O removal; urea removal; Kt/V; ADEQUACY; FLUID;
D O I
10.3109/0886022X.2014.917763
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the Na/H2O and urea removal between residual renal function (RRF) and peritoneal clearance (PC) in peritoneal dialysis patients. Try to explore the difference between RRF and PC in prognosis of chronic kidney disease patients who need peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment. Methods: Weekly Na/H2O and urea removal by PC and RRF were investigated individually. Independent samples t-test was carried out to compare the efficiency of removal between RRF and PC treatment. Pearson correlated analysis was applied to reveal the relationship between Na/H2O and urea removal and Kt/V. Results: Although a higher Na/H2O removal rate by RRF was showed in this investigation, the difference was not statistical significant compared to the one by PC. On the other hand, urea removal by RRF was obviously higher than PC. For every 0.1 Kt/V, Na/H2O removal by RRF was distinctly higher than PD. The Na and H2O removal of RRF were 147.88 +/- 83.72 mmol and 46.54 +/- 39.11 mmol, respectively; and the ones of PD were 11.40 +/- 6.08 mmol and 4.47 +/- 4.79 mmol. By using statistical assay, the correlations relevance between Na/H2O removal and Kt/V in RRF were showed stronger than in PC. However, the total removal of Na/H2O showed a poor correlation with Kt/V in both RRF and PC. Conclusions: The removal efficiency of RRF is much higher than PC. This study suggests that it is important to adjust dialysis program when RRF gets declined. Also the correlation between Na/H2O removal rate and Kt/V is an important monitoring factor for the patients who are receiving peritoneal dialysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1012
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Effect of fluid and sodium removal on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients
    Ates, K
    Nergizoglu, G
    Keven, K
    Sen, A
    Kutlay, S
    Ertürk, S
    Duman, N
    Karatan, O
    Ertug, AE
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 60 (02) : 767 - 776
  • [2] Bargman JM, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P2158, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V12102158
  • [3] Plasma sodium and hypertension
    de Wardener, HE
    He, FJ
    MacGregor, GA
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 66 (06) : 2454 - 2466
  • [4] Golper T., 1997, AM J KIDNEY DIS S, V30, pS67, DOI [10.1016/s0272-6386(97)70028-3, 10.1016/S0272-6386(97)70028-3]
  • [5] Preserved residual renal function is associated with lower oxidative stress in peritoneal dialysis patients
    Ignace, Sophie
    Fouque, Denis
    Arkouche, Walid
    Steghens, Jean-Paul
    Guebre-Egziabher, Fitsum
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 24 (05) : 1685 - 1689
  • [6] Cardiovascular risk in the peritoneal dialysis patient
    Krediet, Raymond T.
    Balafa, Olga
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 6 (08) : 451 - 460
  • [7] Identification of salt-sensitive genes in the kidneys of Dahl rats
    Lighthall, GL
    Hamilton, BP
    Hamlyn, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 22 (08) : 1487 - 1494
  • [8] Lo WK, 2006, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V26, P520
  • [9] Benefits of preserving residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis
    Marron, B.
    Remon, C.
    Perez-Fontan, M.
    Quiros, P.
    Ortiz, A.
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 73 : S42 - S51
  • [10] The relative importance of residual renal function compared with peritoneal clearance for patient survival and quality of life: An analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2
    Termorshuizen, F
    Korevaar, JC
    Dekker, FW
    van Manen, JG
    Boeschoten, EW
    Krediet, RT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2003, 41 (06) : 1293 - 1302