Grip on challenging behavior: process evaluation of the implementation of a care program

被引:35
作者
Zwijsen, Sandra A. [1 ]
Smalbrugge, Martin [1 ]
Eefsting, Jan A. [2 ]
Gerritsen, Debby L. [3 ]
Hertogh, Cees M. P. M. [1 ]
Pot, Anne Margriet [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO, Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Zonnehuisgroep Ussel Vecht, Zwolle, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Ctr Family Med Geriatr Care & Publ Hlth, Dept Primary & Community Care, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, EMGO, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Inst Hlth & Care Res,Dept Clin Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Nursing home; Dementia; Behavior; Process evaluation; Implementation; Intervention; NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; PREDICTORS; DEMENTIA; SUPPORT; TRIALS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6215-15-302
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The Grip on Challenging Behavior care program for managing challenging behavior was implemented in the dementia special care units of 17 Dutch nursing homes. A process evaluation of the implementation of the care program was performed to determine the quality of the implementation and the lessons to be learned for future implementation. Methods: The care program was implemented according to a stepped wedge design. First-order data (data on recruitment, reach, relevance and feasibility) were used to determine the validity of the study, and second-order data (intervention quality and the barriers and facilitators for implementing the care program) were used to describe the implementation process. Two structured questionnaires were administered to care staff and key stakeholders and semi-structured interviews were held in the units. Results: University affiliated and non-affiliated nursing homes from different parts of the Netherlands participated. The resident participation rate was over 95% and the participation rate for the training sessions was 82%. Respondents considered the care program relevant and feasible. The degree of implementation was not optimal. The barriers and facilitators in implementing the care program could be divided into three categories: organizational aspects, culture on the unit and aspects of the care program itself. Conclusions: The recruitment, reach, relevance and feasibility are sufficient to allow for analysis and generalization of the effects of the care program, but the degree of implementation should be taken into account in further analysis. Future projects that involve implementation should consider the specific features of the organization and the cultural orientation of the unit to better adapt to specific needs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Process evaluations of the 5-a-Day projects [J].
Baranowski, T ;
Stables, G .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (02) :157-166
[2]  
DORLAND LM, 2007, PSYCHOL ASSISTANCE O, P37
[3]   Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: systematic review of recent trials [J].
Eldridge, Sandra ;
Ashby, Deborah ;
Bennett, Catherine ;
Wakelin, Melanie ;
Feder, Gene .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7649) :876-880
[4]   Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Vogt, TM ;
Boles, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (09) :1322-1327
[5]  
GROL R, 2011, IMPLEMENTATION EFFEC, P42
[6]   Understanding tailoring in communicating about health [J].
Hawkins, Robert P. ;
Kreuter, Matthew ;
Resnicow, Kenneth ;
Fishbein, Martin ;
Dijkstra, Arie .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2008, 23 (03) :454-466
[7]   Three approaches to qualitative content analysis [J].
Hsieh, HF ;
Shannon, SE .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (09) :1277-1288
[8]  
IBM Corp, 2011, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0
[9]  
Kaufer DI, 2000, J NEUROPSYCH CLIN N, V12, P233, DOI 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12.2.233
[10]   DUTCH ELDERLY CARE PHYSICIAN: A NEW GENERATION OF NURSING HOME PHYSICIAN SPECIALISTS [J].
Koopmans, Raymond T. C. M. ;
Lavrijsen, Jan C. M. ;
Hoek, J. Frank ;
Went, Paul B. M. ;
Schols, Jos M. G. A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2010, 58 (09) :1807-1809