Supervisory control theory applied to swarm robotics

被引:63
作者
Lopes, Yuri K. [1 ]
Trenkwalder, Stefan M. [1 ]
Leal, Andre B. [2 ]
Dodd, Tony J. [1 ]
Gross, Roderich [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Automat Control & Syst Engn, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Santa Catarina State Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Campus Univ Prof Avelino Marcante, BR-89219710 Joinville, SC, Brazil
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Supervisory control theory; Swarm robotics; Formal methods; Kilobot; e-puck; Automatic code generation; TASK ALLOCATION; NOTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11721-016-0119-0
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Currently, the control software of swarm robotics systems is created by ad hoc development. This makes it hard to deploy these systems in real-world scenarios. In particular, it is difficult to maintain, analyse, or verify the systems. Formal methods can contribute to overcome these problems. However, they usually do not guarantee that the implementation matches the specification, because the system's control code is typically generated manually. Also, there is cultural resistance to apply formal methods; they may be perceived as an additional step that does not add value to the final product. To address these problems, we propose supervisory control theory for the domain of swarm robotics. The advantages of supervisory control theory, and its associated tools, are a reduction in the amount of ad hoc development, the automatic generation of control code from modelled specifications, proofs of properties over generated control code, and the reusability of formally designed controllers between different robotic platforms. These advantages are demonstrated in four case studies using the e-puck and Kilobot robot platforms. Experiments with up to 600 physical robots are reported, which show that supervisory control theory can be used to formally develop state-of-the-art solutions to a range of problems in swarm robotics.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 97
页数:33
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Akesson K, 2006, WODES 2006: EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DISCRETE EVENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, P384
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1990, HDB THEORETICAL COMP
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, P 9 C AUTONOMOUS ROB
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1997, Fourth NASA Langley Formal Methods Workshop (LFM)
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, AUTON AGENT MULTI-AG
  • [6] Symbolic planning and control of robot motion - Finding the missing pieces of current methods and ideas
    Belta, Calin
    Bicchi, Antonio
    Egerstedt, Magnus
    Frazzoli, Emilio
    Klavins, Eric
    Pappas, George J.
    [J]. IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2007, 14 (01) : 61 - 70
  • [7] Property-Driven Design for Robot Swarms: A Design Method Based on Prescriptive Modeling and Model Checking
    Brambilla, Manuele
    Brutschy, Arne
    Dorigo, Marco
    Birattari, Mauro
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON AUTONOMOUS AND ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS, 2015, 9 (04)
  • [8] Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspective
    Brambilla, Manuele
    Ferrante, Eliseo
    Birattari, Mauro
    Dorigo, Marco
    [J]. SWARM INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 7 (01) : 1 - 41
  • [9] Brzozowski J.A., 1963, PROC S MATH THEORY A, V12, P529
  • [10] Cassandras C. G., 2008, INTRO DISCRETE EVENT