Effect of hypoxia on mortality and disability in traumatic brain injury according to shock status: A cross-sectional analysis

被引:15
|
作者
Seo, Dong Eun [1 ]
Shin, Sang [2 ]
Song, Kyoung Jun [3 ,4 ]
Ro, Young Sun [4 ]
Hong, Ki Jeong [4 ,5 ]
Park, Jeong Ho [3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Boramae Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Lab Emergency Med Serv, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Seoul, South Korea
来源
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; Hypoxia; Shock; Survival; Disability; HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST; BLOOD-PRESSURE; SLEEP-APNEA; HYPOTENSION; RESUSCITATION; ASSOCIATION; MULTICENTER; MODERATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2018.12.022
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to test the association between hypoxia level and outcomes according to shock status in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Methods: Adult TBI patients transported by emergency medical services in 10 provinces were enrolled. Hypoxia was a main exposure; three groups by oxygen saturation (SaO2, non-hypoxia (>= 94%), mild hypoxia (90 <= SaO2 < 94%)), and severe hypoxia (<90%). Shock status (<systolic blood pressure 90 mmHg) was an interactive exposure. The outcomes were hospital mortality and worsened disability (a 2-point increase of Glasgow Outcome Scale). Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds (AORs) with 95% Confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Of the 6125 patients, the mortality/disability rates were 49.4%/69.0% in severe hypoxia, 30.7%/46.9% in mild hypoxia, and 18.5%/27.5% in nomioxia (p < 0.0001). Mortality/disability rates were 47.1%/57.1% in shock status and 20.5%/31 A% in non-shock status (p < 0.0001). AORs (95% as) for worsened disability/mortality compared with normoxia (reference) were 3.23 (2.47-4.21)/2.24 (1.70-2.96) in patients with severe hypoxia and 2.11 (1.63-2.74)/1.84 (139-2.45) in those with mild hypoxia. AORs (95% CIs) for worsened disability/mortality was 1.58 (120-2.09)/133 (1.01-1.76) by severe hypoxia than normoxia in patient with only non-shock status in the interaction analysis. Conclusions: There was a trend toward worsened outcomes with mild and severe hypoxia in patient with and without shock, however, the only met statistical significance for patients with both severe hypoxia and non-shock status. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1709 / 1715
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Readiness for hospital discharge perceived by caregivers of patients with traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional study
    Ganefianty, Amelia
    Songwathana, Praneed
    Damkliang, Jintana
    BELITUNG NURSING JOURNAL, 2024, 10 (02) : 209 - 214
  • [32] Correlates of sleep disturbance in Veterans with traumatic brain injury and chronic pain: A cross-sectional study
    Miller, Megan
    Williams, Rhonda
    Pagulayan, Kathleen
    Barber, Jason
    Ehde, Dawn M.
    Hoffman, Jeanne
    DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [33] Clinical characteristics of patients with bipolar disorder and premorbid traumatic brain injury: a cross-sectional study
    Ole Kristian Drange
    Arne Einar Vaaler
    Gunnar Morken
    Ole Andreas Andreassen
    Ulrik Fredrik Malt
    Per Ivar Finseth
    International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, 6
  • [34] Outcome and Predicting Factor Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
    Khajavikhan, Javaher
    Vasigh, Aminolah
    Khani, Ali
    Jaafarpour, Molouk
    Kokhazade, Taleb
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (02) : PC16 - PC19
  • [35] Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A cross-sectional study
    Engin, Onur
    Songur, Kadir
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (32)
  • [36] Evaluating the Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Relationships Predicting Suicidal Ideation Following Traumatic Brain Injury
    Awan, Nabil
    DiSanto, Dominic
    Juengst, Shannon B.
    Kumar, Raj G.
    Bertisch, Hilary
    Niemeier, Janet
    Fann, Jesse R.
    Kesinger, Matthew R.
    Sperry, Jason
    Wagner, Amy K.
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2021, 36 (01) : E18 - E29
  • [37] Neuroendocrine challenges and clinical outcomes in men with chronic traumatic brain injury: a cross-sectional study
    Zacharia, Saumya Susan
    Thomas, Raji
    Johnson, Johns T.
    Kapoor, Nitin
    Ramanathan, Saraswathi
    Asha, Hesarghatta S.
    Cherian, Kripa Elizabeth
    Paul, Thomas, V
    PITUITARY, 2024, 27 (05) : 693 - 704
  • [38] Clinical characteristics of patients with bipolar disorder and premorbid traumatic brain injury: a cross-sectional study
    Drange, Ole Kristian
    Vaaler, Arne Einar
    Morken, Gunnar
    Andreassen, Ole Andreas
    Malt, Ulrik Fredrik
    Finseth, Per Ivar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2018, 6
  • [39] Prevalence of Sleep Disturbances Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Cross-sectional Survey
    Geraldine, Martens
    Jean-Francois, Kaux
    Nicolas, Lejeune
    Aurore, Thibaut
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2022, 37 (05) : E415 - E415
  • [40] A Cross-Sectional Study on Cerebral Hemodynamics After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in a Pediatric Population
    Thibeault, Corey M.
    Thorpe, Samuel
    O'Brien, Michael J.
    Canac, Nicolas
    Ranjbaran, Mina
    Patanam, Ilyas
    Sarraf, Artin
    LeVangie, James
    Scalzo, Fabien
    Wilk, Seth J.
    Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon
    Hamilton, Robert B.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2018, 9