Divergence in social foraging among morphs of the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus

被引:5
作者
Olafsdottir, Gudbjorg Asta [1 ]
Andreou, Alexandreou [1 ]
Magellan, Kit [2 ]
Kristjansson, Bjarni K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Res Ctr Westfjords, IS-415 Bolungarvik, Iceland
[2] Univ Girona, Inst Ecol Aquat, E-17071 Girona, Spain
[3] Holar Univ Collage, IS-455 Saudarkrokur, Iceland
关键词
information sharing; resource defence; scrounger-producer; shoaling; social learning; speciation; KLEPTOPARASITIC PREY COMPETITION; THREESPINE STICKLEBACK; RESOURCE DEFENSE; SHOALING PREFERENCES; POECILIA-RETICULATA; FOOD EXPLOITATION; PREDATION RISK; INFORMATION; AGGRESSION; FISH;
D O I
10.1111/bij.12320
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Foraging in social groups has a number of benefits but can also increase the risk of exploitation. High tendency to shoal may be correlated with groups foraging, although facultatively social fish adjust both shoaling decisions and food resource defence based on intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The main aim of this study was to examine the relationships between shoaling, solitary foraging and aggression, forager tolerance of conspecifics joining at a discovered food patch and forager exploitation of resources discovered by others. We used two intra-lacustrine three-spined stickleback morph pairs, lava and mud, and monomorphic morphs from each of lava and mud habitats. The lava morph formed less cohesive shoals, was bolder during solitary foraging, approached and entered an occupied food patch less frequently than the mud morph, suggesting a link between shoaling and the propensity for social foraging. However, shoaling tendency and joiner tolerance were not correlated at a population level. Intralacustrine lava and mud morphs differed more markedly in joiner tolerance than morphs from single habitat lakes, whereas the opposite was true for shoaling tendency. We conclude that, in addition to differentiation in shoaling tendency, the lava and mud morphs differ in social foraging and these variations may act to promote population divergence. (C) 2014 The Linnean Society of London,
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 203
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF HUNGER AND CESTODE PARASITISM ON THE SHOALING DECISIONS OF SMALL FRESH-WATER FISH [J].
BARBER, I ;
HUNTINGFORD, FA ;
CROMPTON, DWT .
JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 1995, 47 (03) :524-536
[2]   Behavioural differences between individuals and two populations of stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) [J].
Bell, AM .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2005, 18 (02) :464-473
[3]   Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: Moving beyond controversy? [J].
Berlocher, SH ;
Feder, JL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2002, 47 :773-815
[4]  
Brown J. L., 1964, Wilson Bulletin, V76, P160
[5]   Ownership, size and reproductive status affect the outcome of food ball contests in a dung roller beetle: when do enemies share? [J].
Chamorro-Florescano, Ivette A. ;
Favila, Mario E. ;
Macias-Ordonez, Rogelio .
EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 2011, 25 (02) :277-289
[6]   AGGRESSIVE INTERACTIONS AND INTER-CONTEST INTERVAL - HOW LONG DO WINNERS KEEP WINNING [J].
CHASE, ID ;
BARTOLOMEO, C ;
DUGATKIN, LA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1994, 48 (02) :393-400
[7]   THE EVOLUTIONARY ADVANTAGES OF GROUP FORAGING [J].
CLARK, CW ;
MANGEL, M .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1986, 30 (01) :45-75
[8]   FORAGING AND FLOCKING STRATEGIES - INFORMATION IN AN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT [J].
CLARK, CW ;
MANGEL, M .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1984, 123 (05) :626-641
[9]   Individual sociability and choosiness between shoal types [J].
Cote, Julien ;
Fogarty, Sean ;
Sih, Andrew .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2012, 83 (06) :1469-1476
[10]   Predation risk as a driving force for phenotypic assortment: a cross-population comparison [J].
Croft, D. P. ;
Darden, S. K. ;
Ruxton, G. D. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 276 (1663) :1899-1904