Imaging Diagnosis of Adenomyosis

被引:14
作者
O'Shea, Aileen [1 ]
Figueiredo, Gabrielle [1 ]
Lee, Susanna I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; adenomyosis; SONOGRAPHIC FEATURES; DIFFUSE ADENOMYOSIS; ENDOVAGINAL US; UTERINE; MRI; ULTRASOUND; MASSES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1055/s-0040-1719017
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Uterine adenomyosis can be diagnosed on ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a high degree of accuracy. Adenomyosis is a myometrial process that can appear as diffuse or focal on imaging. Diffuse adenomyosis typically causes uterine enlargement, while focal adenomyosis can mimic other myometrial lesions, such as leiomyomas. Imaging features frequently seen on US include a heterogenous thickened myometrium and myometrial cysts. On MRI, widening of the junctional zone, whether focal or diffuse, and the presence of myometrial cysts, either simple or hemorrhagic, support the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Despite these characteristic imaging appearances, there are several gynecologic pathologies which can mimic adenomyosis and it is important to be vigilant of these when interpreting cross-sectional imaging exams. The decision to evaluate patients with US or MRI is contingent on multiple factors, including availability of the necessary technology and expertise for the latter. However, MRI appears to offer greater specificity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 128
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   MRI for adenomyosis: a pictorial review [J].
Agostinho, Lisa ;
Cruz, Rita ;
Osorio, Filipa ;
Alves, Joao ;
Setubal, Antonio ;
Guerra, Adalgisa .
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2017, 8 (06) :549-556
[2]   Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in vitro study [J].
Atri, M ;
Reinhold, C ;
Mehio, AR ;
Chapman, WB ;
Bret, PM .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (03) :783-790
[3]   Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology [J].
Bazot, M ;
Cortez, A ;
Darai, E ;
Rouger, J ;
Chopier, J ;
Antoine, JM ;
Uzan, S .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (11) :2427-2433
[4]   Diffuse and focal adenomyosis: MR imaging findings [J].
Byun, JY ;
Kim, SE ;
Choi, BG ;
Ko, GY ;
Jung, SE ;
Choi, KH .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1999, 19 :S161-S170
[5]   Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy [J].
Champaneria, Rita ;
Abedin, Parveen ;
Daniels, Jane ;
Balogun, Moji ;
Khan, Khalid S. .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (11) :1374-1384
[6]   Venetian blind shadowing on ultrasound [J].
Chin, Leanne Han Qing ;
Li, Yan-Lin ;
Lee, Kam-Ho .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (02) :796-797
[7]   Adenomyosis: A Sonographic Diagnosis [J].
Cunningham, Ryan K. ;
Horrow, Mindy M. ;
Smith, Ryan J. ;
Springer, Joseph .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2018, 38 (05) :1576-1589
[8]   Diffusion MRI of uterine and ovarian masses: identifying the benign lesions [J].
Davarpanah, Amir H. ;
Kambadakone, Avinash ;
Holalkere, Nagaraj S. ;
Guimaraes, Alexander R. ;
Hahn, Peter F. ;
Lee, Susanna I. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (12) :2466-2475
[9]   Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI for diagnosis of adenornyosis [J].
Dueholm, Margit ;
Lundorf, Erik .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 19 (06) :505-512
[10]   Detection of peritoneal dissemination in gynecological malignancy: evaluation by diffusion-weighted MR imaging [J].
Fujii, Shinva ;
Matsusue, Eiji ;
Kanasaki, Yoshiko ;
Kanamori, Yasunobu ;
Nakanishi, Junko ;
Sugihara, Shuji ;
Kigawa, Junzo ;
Terakawa, Naoki ;
Ogawa, Toshihide .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (01) :18-23