Affinity cryogel monoliths for screening for optimal separation conditions and chromatographic separation of cells

被引:64
作者
Dainiak, Maria B.
Galaev, Igor Yu.
Mattiasson, Bo
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Biotechnol, Ctr Chem & Chem Engn, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Protista Biotechnol AB, IDEON, SE-22370 Lund, Sweden
关键词
ConA-cryogel monoliths; macroporous; elastic; 96-minicolumn plate format; column format; screening; cell chromatography; cell detachment; compression of the adsorbent;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2006.05.089
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Suitable conditions for separating cells using a chromatographic procedure were evaluated in parallel chromatography on minicolumns. A 96-hole minicolumn plate filled with cryogel monoliths (18.8 mm x 7.1 mm O) with immobilized concanavalin A was used. Chromatographic columns (113 mm x 7.1 mm O) were used for chromatographic resolution of a mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli cells. Separation of a cell mixture containing equal amounts of cells of both types performed in a column format under the determined optimal conditions, resulted in a quantitative capture of applied S. cerevisiae cells, while E. coli passed through the column. Bound S. cerevisiae cells were released by flow-induced detachment and by compression of the adsorbent in the presence of 0.3 M methyl U-D-manno-pyranoside. The flowthrough and the eluted fractions were analyzed by plate counting and by registering metabolic activity of S. cerevisiae cells in the eluted fractions after capturing on ConA-cryogel monoliths in a 96-minicolumn plate format. The flowthrough fraction contained E. coli cells with nearly 100% purity, whereas the fraction eluted by compression of the adsorbent contained viable S. cerevisiae cells with 95% purity. Thus, an efficient chromatographic separation of cells was achieved using affinity cryogel column. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 150
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Chromatography of microbial cells using continuous supermacroporous affinity and ion-exchange columns [J].
Arvidsson, P ;
Plieva, FM ;
Savina, IN ;
Lozinsky, VI ;
Fexby, S ;
Bülow, L ;
Galaev, IY ;
Mattiasson, B .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2002, 977 (01) :27-38
[2]   CELL AFFINITY-CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH LIGANDS IMMOBILIZED THROUGH CLEAVABLE MERCURY SULFUR BONDS [J].
BONNAFOUS, JC ;
DORNAND, J ;
FAVERO, J ;
SIZES, M ;
BOSCHETTI, E ;
MANI, JC .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 1983, 58 (1-2) :93-107
[3]   Isolation and concentration of Salmonellae with an immunoaffinity column [J].
Brewster, JD .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 55 (01) :287-293
[4]   Detachment strategies for affinity-adsorbed cells [J].
Cao, X ;
Eisenthal, R ;
Hubble, J .
ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 31 (1-2) :153-160
[5]   SEPARATION AND ISOLATION OF LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATIONS OF DIFFERENT AFFINITY FOR THE ANTIGEN [J].
CARVAJAL, RE ;
PORRAS, FM ;
GARCIACARRENO, F .
IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS, 1984, 8 (02) :101-106
[6]   Detachment of affinity-captured bioparticles by elastic deformation of a macroporous hydrogel [J].
Dainiak, MB ;
Kumar, A ;
Galaev, IY ;
Mattiasson, B .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (04) :849-854
[7]   Cell chromatography: Separation of different microbial cells using IMAC supermacroporous monolithic columns [J].
Dainiak, MB ;
Plieva, FM ;
Galaev, IY ;
Hatti-Kaul, R ;
Mattiasson, B .
BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 2005, 21 (02) :644-649
[8]   Direct capture of product from fermentation broth using a cell-repelling ion exchanger [J].
Dainiak, MB ;
Galaev, IY ;
Mattiasson, B .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2002, 942 (1-2) :123-131
[9]  
DAINIAK MB, IN PRESS ENZYME MICR
[10]   Cell/adsorbent interactions in expanded bed adsorption of proteins [J].
Feuser, J ;
Walter, J ;
Kula, MR ;
Thömmes, J .
BIOSEPARATION, 1999, 8 (1-5) :99-109