Mode of delivery and subsequent fertility

被引:26
作者
Evers, E. C. [1 ]
McDermott, K. C. [2 ]
Blomquist, J. L. [3 ]
Handa, V. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Greater Baltimore Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol, Baltimore, MD 21204 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cesarean section; fertility; reproduction; childbearing; inter-birth interval; CESAREAN-SECTION; INFERTILITY; PREGNANCY; BIRTH; IMPACT; METAANALYSIS; CHILDBIRTH;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/deu197
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
When compared with vaginal delivery, is Cesarean delivery associated with reduced childbearing, a prolonged inter-birth interval or infertility? Women whose first delivery was by Cesarean section were not significantly different from those who delivered vaginally with respect to subsequent deliveries, inter-birth interval or infertility after delivery. Some studies have suggested that delivery by Cesarean section reduces subsequent fertility, while others have reported no association. This was a planned secondary analysis of the Mothers' Outcomes After Delivery study, a longitudinal cohort study. This analysis included 956 women with 1835 deliveries, who completed a study questionnaire at 6-11 years (median [interquartile range]: 8.1 [7.1, 9.8]) after their first delivery. Exclusion criteria regarding the first birth were: maternal age < 15 or > 50 years, delivery at < 37 weeks gestation, placenta previa, multiple gestation, known fetal congenital abnormality, stillbirth, prior myomectomy and abruption. Of the 956 women included, the first delivery was by Cesarean section for 534 women and by vaginal birth for 422 women. Infertility was self-reported. To compare maternal characteristics by mode of first delivery, P-values were calculated using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's chi(2) test for categorical variables and a Kruskall-Wallis test for continuous variables. We also considered whether, across all deliveries to date, a prior Cesarean is associated with decreased fertility. In this analysis, self-reported infertility after each delivery (across all participants) was considered as a function of one or more prior Cesarean births, using generalized estimating equations to control for within-woman correlation. No differences were observed between the Cesarean and vaginal groups (for first delivery) with respect to infertility after their most recent delivery (7 versus 6%, P = 0.597), the interval between their first and second births (30.8 versus 30.6 months, P = 0.872), or multiparity (75 versus 76%, P = 0.650). Across all births, a history of Cesarean delivery was not significantly associated with infertility (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.26). Women who reported infertility prior to their first delivery were significantly more likely to report infertility after each subsequent delivery (OR, 5.16; 95% CI, 3.60-7.39). Due to the use of self-reported infertility, the fertility status of some participants may be misclassified. Also, the small sample size may result in insufficient power to detect small differences between groups. Finally, a relatively high proportion of our participants were over age 35 at the time of first delivery (26%) and highly educated (37% with graduate degrees), which may indicate that our population may not be generalizable. While some prior studies have shown decreased family size among women who deliver by Cesarean, our results suggest that the rate of infertility is not different after Cesarean compared with vaginal birth. Our findings should be reassuring to women who deliver by Cesarean section. This study was funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH, R01-HD056275). No competing interests are declared. N/A.
引用
收藏
页码:2569 / 2574
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study
    Bahl, R
    Strachan, B
    Murphy, DJ
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7435): : 311 - 314
  • [2] Absence of conception after caesarean section: voluntary or involuntary?
    Bhattacharya, S
    Porter, M
    Harrild, K
    Naji, A
    Mollison, J
    van Teijlingen, E
    Campbell, DM
    Hall, MH
    Templeton, A
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (03) : 268 - 275
  • [3] Mothers' Satisfaction with Planned Vaginal and Planned Cesarean Birth
    Blomquist, Joan L.
    Quiroz, Lieschen H.
    MacMillan, Deborah
    Mccullough, Alexis
    Handa, Victoria L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2011, 28 (05) : 383 - 388
  • [4] Self-reported difficulty in conceiving as a measure of infertility
    Dick, MLB
    Bain, CJ
    Purdie, DM
    Siskind, V
    Molloy, D
    Green, AC
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (12) : 2711 - 2717
  • [5] Pregnancy after Caesarean section: fewer or later?
    Eijsink, J. J. H.
    van der Leeuw-Harmsen, L.
    van der Linden, P. J. Q.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2008, 23 (03) : 543 - 547
  • [6] Friedman S, 2012, OBSTET GYNECOL, V120, P1021, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265de39, http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265de39]
  • [7] Does a traumatic birth experience have an impact on future reproduction?
    Gottvall, K
    Waldenström, U
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (03) : 254 - 260
  • [8] Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gurol-Urganci, I.
    Bou-Antoun, S.
    Lim, C. P.
    Cromwell, D. A.
    Mahmood, T. A.
    Templeton, A.
    van der Meulen, J. H.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (07) : 1943 - 1952
  • [9] Pelvic Floor Disorders 5-10 Years After Vaginal or Cesarean Childbirth
    Handa, Victoria L.
    Blomquist, Joan L.
    Knoepp, Leise R.
    Hoskey, Kay A.
    McDermott, Kelly C.
    Munoz, Alvaro
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) : 777 - 784
  • [10] Mode of delivery and problems in subsequent births: A register-based study from Finland
    Hemminki, E
    Shelley, J
    Gisster, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (01) : 169 - 177