Simple preoperative risk scale accurately predicts perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy following esophagectomy for malignancy

被引:20
作者
Fuchs, H. F. [1 ,5 ]
Harnsberger, C. R. [1 ]
Broderick, R. C. [1 ]
Chang, D. C. [3 ,4 ]
Sandler, B. J. [1 ]
Jacobsen, G. R. [1 ]
Bouvet, M. [2 ]
Horgan, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Ctr Future Surg, Div Minimally Invas Surg, Dept Surg, 9500 Gilman Dr,MC 0740, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Surg Oncol, Dept Surg, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Surg, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Cologne, Dept Gen Surg, Cologne, Germany
关键词
esophageal resection; hospital volume; nomogram; risk analysis; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY; CANCER; OUTCOMES; RESECTION; ADENOCARCINOMA; ESOPHAGUS; VOLUME; SURVIVAL; INDEX;
D O I
10.1111/dote.12451
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Surgery remains one of the major treatment options available to patients with esophageal cancer, with high mortality in certain cohorts. The aim of this study was to develop a simple preoperative risk scale based on patient factors, hospital factors, and tumor pathology to predict the risk of perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to create the risk scale. Patients who underwent open or laparoscopic transhiatal and transthoracic esophageal resection were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition codes. Patients < 18 years and those with peritoneal disease were excluded. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to define a predictive model of perioperative mortality and to create a simple risk scale. From 1998 to 2011, a total of 23 751 patients underwent esophagectomy. The observed overall perioperative mortality rate for this cohort was 7.7%. Minimally invasive techniques, and operations performed in higher volume centers were protective, whereas increasing age, comorbidities and diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma were independent predictors of mortality. Based on this population, a risk scale from 0-16 was created. The calibration revealed a good agreement between the observed and risk scale-predicted probabilities. A set of sensitivity/specificity analyses was then performed to define normal (score 0-7) and high risk (score 8-16) patients for clinical practice. Mortality in patients with a score of 0-7 ranged from 1.3-7.6%, compared with 10.5-34.5% in patients with a score of 8-16. This simple preoperative risk scale may accurately predict the risk of perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy and can be used as a clinical tool for preoperative counseling.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2007, HEALTHC COST UT PROJ
  • [2] Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years
    Ando, N
    Ozawa, S
    Kitagawa, Y
    Shinozawa, Y
    Kitajima, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (02) : 225 - 232
  • [3] Bartels H, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P840
  • [4] Development and Evaluation of the Universal ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator: A Decision Aid and Informed Consent Tool for Patients and Surgeons
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Liu, Yaoming
    Paruch, Jennifer L.
    Zhou, Lynn
    Kmiecik, Thomas E.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Cohen, Mark E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (05) : 833 - +
  • [5] Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative
    Birkmeyer, JD
    Finlayson, EVA
    Birkmeyer, CM
    [J]. SURGERY, 2001, 130 (03) : 415 - 422
  • [6] Reporting of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Esophagectomy A Systematic Review
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Strong, Sean
    McNair, Angus G. K.
    Brookes, Sara T.
    Crosby, Tom
    Griffin, S. Michael
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (04) : 658 - 666
  • [7] Preoperative risk analysis in patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus
    Bollschweiler, E
    Schröder, W
    Hölscher, AH
    Siewert, JR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (08) : 1106 - 1110
  • [8] Conceptualizing Administrative Databases as Screening Tools for Health System Quality Rethinking the Issue of Data Accuracy
    Chang, David C.
    Evans, Christopher
    Parker, Joseph
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [9] Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation
    Coker, Alisa M.
    Barajas-Gamboa, Juan S.
    Cheverie, Joslin
    Jacobsen, Garth R.
    Sandler, Bryan J.
    Talamini, Mark A.
    Bouvet, Michael
    Horgan, Santiago
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (02): : 89 - 94
  • [10] Comparing outcomes after transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy: A 5-year prospective cohort of 17,395 patients
    Connors, Rafe C.
    Reuben, Brian C.
    Neumayer, Leigh A.
    Bull, David A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 205 (06) : 735 - 740