Measurements of optic disk size with HRT II, stratus OCT, and funduscopy are not interchangeable

被引:30
作者
Barkana, Yaniv
Harizman, Noga
Gerber, Yariv
Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
Ritch, Robert
机构
[1] New York Eye & Ear Infirm, Dept Ophthalmol, Glaucoma Serv, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Manhattan Eye Ear & Throat Hosp, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] NYU, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] New York Med Coll, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[5] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2006.03.065
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
center dot PURPOSE: To assess the interchangeability of optic disk size measurements using slit-lamp funduscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT-3), and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (HRT-II) in clinical practice. center dot DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized clinical study. center dot METHODS: Measurements of vertical disk diameter (VDD) were obtained with the three methods. Disk area was obtained from OCT and HRT printouts. True agreement between methods in measuring VDD was assessed using Bland-Altman graphs and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). Disks were classified as small, average, or large, and agreement between methods in this classification was assessed using kappa statistics. center dot RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were enrolled (mean age 53.4 +/- 14.3 years). VDD (mean +/- SD) was 1.58 +/- 0.15, 1.70 +/- 0.22, and 1.90 +/- 0.24 mm with funduscopy, HRT, and OCT, respectively. Very large LoA were observed: -0.29 to 0.70 mm for OCT and HRT, -0.07 to 0.71 mm for OCT and funduscopy, and -0.29 to 0.53 mm for HRT and funduscopy. There was poor agreement (kappa < 0.4) in classification of disk size as small, average, or large whether disk diameter or area was compared and using two definitions of disk size. center dot CONCLUSIONS: We observed a large range of differences in estimating disk size with HRT, OCT, and funduscopy. This precludes interchangeable use of these measurements in clinical practice, and does not allow simple conversion formulas to be proposed. In addition, there is poor agreement between these methods in classifying disk size as small, average, or large. At present, estimation of both absolute and relative disk size can only be defined separately for each measurement modality.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 380
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   An appraisal of the disc-macula distance to disc diameter ratio in the assessment of optic disc size [J].
Barr, DB ;
Weir, CR ;
Purdie, AT .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1999, 19 (05) :365-375
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy classifiers and stereophotograph evaluation for prediction of visual field abnormalities in glaucoma-suspect eyes [J].
Bowd, C ;
Zangwill, LM ;
Medeiros, FA ;
Hao, JC ;
Chan, K ;
Lee, TW ;
Sejnowski, TJ ;
Goldbaum, MH ;
Sample, PA ;
Crowston, JG ;
Weinreb, RN .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 (07) :2255-2262
[4]   THE AREA OF THE NEURORETINAL RIM OF THE OPTIC-NERVE IN NORMAL EYES [J].
BRITTON, RJ ;
DRANCE, SM ;
SCHULZER, M ;
DOUGLAS, GR ;
MAWSON, DK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1987, 103 (04) :497-504
[5]   Comparison of measurement methods requires appropriate statistical methodology [J].
Cesana, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 137 (04) :787-788
[6]   TEST-RETEST VARIABILITY OF TOPOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS WITH CONFOCAL SCANNING LASER TOMOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH GLAUCOMA AND CONTROL SUBJECTS [J].
CHAUHAN, BC ;
LEBLANC, RP ;
MCCORMICK, TA ;
ROGERS, JB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1994, 118 (01) :9-15
[7]  
Coleman AL, 1996, J GLAUCOMA, V5, P433
[8]   Comparison of optic nerve head assessment with a digital stereoscopic camera (Discam), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and stereophotography [J].
Correnti, AJ ;
Wollstein, G ;
Price, LL ;
Schuman, JS .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (08) :1499-1505
[9]   Subjective and objective optic nerve assessment in African Americans and whites [J].
Girkin, CA ;
McGwin, G ;
Long, C ;
DeLeon-Ortega, J ;
Graf, CM ;
Everett, AW .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 (07) :2272-2278
[10]   Agreement among 3 optical imaging methods for the assessment of optic disc topography [J].
Hoffmann, EM ;
Bowd, C ;
Medeiros, FA ;
Boden, C ;
Grus, FH ;
Bourne, RR ;
Zangwill, LM ;
Weinreb, RN .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 112 (12) :2149-2156