Life cycle assessment of cellulose packaging materials production: folding box board and kraftliner paper

被引:14
|
作者
Mourad, Anna Lucia [1 ]
Gomes da Silva, Henrique Luvison [2 ]
Batista Nogueira, Julio Cesar [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Food Technol CETEA ITAL, Packaging Technol Ctr, BR-13070178 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Klabin SA, BR-84275000 Telemaco Borba, PR, Brazil
来源
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Cardboard; CTMP; Efficiency; Life cycle assessment; Paperboard; PULP;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-013-0690-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many companies around the world have been challenged to make their products in a more sustainable way in the last decade in order to minimize their environmental impacts. Klabin, the largest producer, exporter, and recycler of paper in Brazil, has made great efforts to exchange old for new and more efficient equipment to produce cellulose packaging materials. The objective of this study was to measure the benefits of modernization of its plant located in the southern region of the country for manufacturing carrier board/folding box board (CB/FBB) and kraftliner paper (KP). The goal established was analyzed through a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment methodology. The modernization carried out has led to several improvements such as the reductions measured by the functional units of 1,000 kg of CB/FBB and 1,000 kg of KP, respectively, of energy consumption (21 and 3 %), water (8.5 % for CB/FBB only), wood (6.6 and 7.2 %), and land use (6.9 and 7.1 %). The environmental impact categories (according to CML 2001) that have suffered greater reductions are human toxicity (68 and 69 %), abiotic depletion (59 and 28 %), and global warming potential (51 and 9 %) for the same reference units. The results achieved clearly show the importance of renewing industrial plant in order to achieve better environmental performance and also provide a historical inventory perspective for the company to establish future targets for improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:968 / 976
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ON THE USEFULNESS OF LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF PACKAGING
    HEIJUNGS, R
    GUINEE, JB
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1995, 19 (05) : 665 - 668
  • [32] Environmental life cycle assessment in microelectronics packaging
    Andrae, ASG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2006, 11 (03): : 215 - 216
  • [33] Biodegradable packaging life-cycle assessment
    Bohlmann, GM
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 2004, 23 (04): : 342 - 346
  • [34] Pole position in the production of board and packaging paper with NipcoFlex Shoe Presses
    Schuwerk, W
    WOCHENBLATT FUR PAPIERFABRIKATION, 1999, 127 (06): : 380 - 385
  • [35] Life cycle assessment of advanced bioethanol production from pulp and paper sludge
    Sebastiao, Diogo
    Goncalves, Margarida S.
    Marques, Susana
    Fonseca, Cesar
    Girio, Francisco
    Oliveira, Ana C.
    Matos, Cristina T.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 208 : 100 - 109
  • [36] Social Life Cycle Assessment of Pulp and Paper Production - A Portuguese Case Study
    Santos, Andreia
    Norris, Catherine Benoit
    Barbosa-Povoa, Ana
    Carvalho, Ana
    30TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS A-C, 2020, 48 : 859 - 864
  • [37] Life cycle assessment of woodfree printing paper life cycle inventory
    Katsura, Toru
    Niwata, Hiroaki
    Nakazawa, Katsuhito
    Katayama, Keiichi
    Sakamura, Hiroyasu
    Yasui, Itaru
    2000, JAPAN TAPPI, Tokyo, Japan (54): : 84 - 91
  • [38] The Relevance of Recyclability for the Life Cycle Assessment of Packaging Based on Design for Life Cycle
    Keller, Jonas
    Scagnetti, Carla
    Albrecht, Stefan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [39] Safety assessment of paper and board food packaging: Chemical analysis and genotoxicity of possible contaminants in packaging
    Ozaki, A
    Yamaguchi, Y
    Fujita, T
    Kuroda, K
    Endo, G
    FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS, 2005, 22 (10): : 1053 - 1060
  • [40] Life cycle assessment of manufacturing cellulose nanofibril-reinforced chitosan composite films for packaging applications
    Prabaharan Graceraj Ponnusamy
    Sudhagar Mani
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 380 - 394