In defense of housing: The view of Anglo-American radical geography on the housing crisis and its use in Czechia

被引:0
作者
Orcigr, Vaclav [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Social Sci, Inst Sociol Studies, Prague, Czech Republic
来源
GEOGRAFIE | 2020年 / 125卷 / 03期
关键词
housing crisis; politics; development; cities; neoliberalism; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.37040/geografie2020125030375
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The review essay summarizes the basic thoughts and concepts found in Madden and Marcuse's book (2016) In Defense of Housing. It also connects its key findings with the current situation of housing in Czechia - with a special focus on the capital Prague. The essay presents current data on the alleged housing crisis in Czechia and seeks to find similarities with the development of the housing situation and housing policies in the Anglo-American context analyzed in the book. It shows that most of its conclusions can be used in the post-socialist context of Central Europe, as some of the processes identified in the 1970s at the start of neoliberal policies in the West are now also visible, and even amplified, in former socialist countries. The essay outlines some basic measures that may help to improve the housing situation in Czechia. The review also outlines several ideas that could challenge the dominant discourse promoted by private investors calling for a removal of building regulations and the public's exclusion from decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 395
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ARNIKA, 2019, KRIZ BYDL SE PROHL Z
[2]  
Brenner Neil., 2011, CITIES PEOPLE NOT PR
[3]  
CASTELLS M., 1973, MOD CHANG ADV IND SO
[4]  
Crouch C., 2004, POSTDEMOCRACY
[5]  
CT24, 2020, NOV STAV ZAK EK AKT
[6]  
CTK, 2019, CECH NOV BYT POTR 11
[7]  
CTK, 2018, CEN BYT DOM ROST CES
[8]  
DIVINOVA J, 2018, BYT PRAZE ZLATO INVE
[9]  
FERENCUHOVA S., 2013, SOCIOLOGIE MESTA 20
[10]   Financialization and housing: Between globalization and Varieties of Capitalism [J].
Fernandez, Rodrigo ;
Aalbers, Manuel B. .
COMPETITION & CHANGE, 2016, 20 (02) :71-88