Pore Pressure and Kσ Evaluation at High Overburden Pressure under Field Drainage Conditions. I: Centrifuge Experiments

被引:17
作者
Ni, M. [1 ]
Abdoun, T. [1 ]
Dobry, R. [1 ]
Zehtab, K. [2 ]
Marr, A. [3 ]
El-Sekelly, W. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 110 8th St,JEC 4049, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[2] Geocomp, 125 Nagog Pk, Acton, MA 01720 USA
[3] Geocomp & GeoTesting Express, 125 Nagog Pk, Acton, MA 01720 USA
[4] Mansoura Univ, Dept Struct Engn, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
[5] New York Univ Abu Dhabi, POB 129188, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LOTUNG DOWNHOLE ARRAY; LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE; FOUNDATION; BEHAVIOR; SOILS; SHEAR;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002303
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This article is the first of two companion papers studying the effect of overburden pressure on the liquefaction behavior of saturated Ottawa sand. A series of four centrifuge tests were conducted simulating a 5-m layer of this sand having two different relative densities, and subjected to overburden effective pressures of similar to 100 and 600 kPa (1 and 6 atm). The objective was to study the pore pressure response of the soil to base acceleration under low and high pressure, including evaluation of the overburden pressure factor K-sigma for idealized field drainage conditions. The sand layer had a bottom impervious and a top pervious boundary, approximating a common field situation. A novel experimental technique was developed using a dry lead shot layer to provide the necessary high level of pressure. The performances of the sand layer under low and high confining pressure were compared in terms of times histories and profiles of excess pore pressures, cyclic stress ratios (CSR), and cyclic shear strains gamma c, with some of the parameters determined using system identification. It was found that pore pressure dissipation started earlier at shallower depths, and that partial drainage was more significant in the 6-atm than in the 1-atm tests. Field overburden pressure correction factors at 6 atm, K-sigma, obtained from the centrifuge tests for (r(u))(max)=0.8 in 10 cycles of shaking and including the partial drainage effect, were found to be higher than 1.0 for both D-r=45% and 80% This is different from the usual laboratory undrained K-sigma < 1 based on cyclic triaxial and simple shear laboratory tests and reflected in the current state of practice. The discrepancy is related to the more significant effect of partial drainage and deviation from the undrained assumption at the higher confining pressure for the field drainage and other conditions of these centrifuge tests. (c) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Pore Pressure and Kσ Evaluation at High Overburden Pressure under Field Drainage Conditions. II: Additional Interpretation
    Abdoun, T.
    Ni, M.
    Dobry, R.
    Zehtab, K.
    Marr, A.
    El-Sekelly, W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (09)
  • [2] Centrifuge and Large-Scale Modeling of Seismic Pore Pressures in Sands: Cyclic Strain Interpretation
    Abdoun, T.
    Gonzalez, M. A.
    Thevanayagam, S.
    Dobry, R.
    Elgamal, A.
    Zeghal, M.
    Mercado, V. M.
    El Shamy, U.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (08) : 1215 - 1234
  • [3] Embankment dam on liquefiable foundation - Dynamic behavior and densification remediation
    Adalier, K
    Sharp, MK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (11) : 1214 - 1224
  • [4] Foundation liquefaction countermeasures for earth embankments
    Adalier, K
    Elgamal, AW
    Martin, GR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 124 (06) : 500 - 517
  • [5] Anderson J.D., 2017, Fundamentals of Aerodynamics
  • [6] Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity
    Andrus, RD
    Stokoe, KH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 126 (11) : 1015 - 1025
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1990, P SEED MEM S
  • [8] BOLTONSE.H, 1970, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V60, P125
  • [9] Boulanger R., 2004, P 11 SDEE 3 ICEGE BE
  • [10] Boulanger R. W., 2011, J GEOTECH GEOENVIRON, V138, P898